My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46608
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46608
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:20:46 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:47:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/26/2001
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR PR5
From
Add 560 Acreas
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14. Specific approvals have been granted or are proposed. These approvals are addressed in <br />the following section, Sec[ion B (2.07.6(2)(m)). <br />15. In consultation with the Colorado Division of Wildlife and the United Stales Fish and <br />Wildlife Service, the Division found that the activities proposed by the applicant would <br />not affect the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the <br />destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitats (2.07.6(2)(n)), provided that <br />appropriate mitigation efforts are performed.. Letters from both agencies aze presented in <br />Volume III, Exhibit 9 of the permit application document. <br />In a letter dated July 31, 2001, the L1,S. Fish & Wildlife Service stated [hat the proposed <br />operations in Permit Revision No.S would not impact threatened or endangered species, <br />since the revision would not increase the production rate or the water depletion estimate <br />that had been established in Permit Revision No. 3. Based on the water depletion estimate <br />supplied by Bowie Resources Limited for Permit Revision No. 3, and on the biological <br />assessment performed by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, through the Office of Surface <br />Mining, the Division found that the activities proposed by the applicant would not affect <br />the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or <br />adverse modification of their critical habitats (2.07.6(2)(n)). This was because Bowie <br />Resources contributed a one time fee to the Recovery Implementation Program for <br />Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin, a mitigation plan sponsored <br />by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. The fee was based on the water depletion estimate <br />for the mine plan changes proposed in Permit Revision No. 3. Proof of payment is <br />contained in a letter, dated December 17, 1999, from Bowie Resources Limited to the <br />National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. 7'he letter is in Exhibit 9 of Volume III of the <br />Bowie No. 2 permit application. <br />16. The Division has contacted the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation Fees Branch. As <br />of this time, September 25. 2001, the operator is current in the payment of reclamation <br />fees required by 30 CFR, Chapter VII, subchapter R (2.07.6(2)(0)). <br />Section B -Rule 4 <br />I. Roads -Rule 4.03 <br />A. Haul Roads <br />Two sections of haul roads were built at the Bowie No. 2 Mine. One paved haul <br />road is used to carry coal from the mine portal to the old State highway 133. A <br />second haul road leading to the gob pile was built along an old rail bed. <br />Alternative criteria and specifications were not used during the design of <br />haul roads (4.03. I (1)(e)). <br />?t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.