Laserfiche WebLink
5. STAFF FINDINGS (Table 7): <br />The following excerpt from Table 7 Criteria itemizes each specific Criteria for a Conditional <br />Use Permit for Mining and Staff s findings for each. Criteria clearly not applicable have <br />been deleted. <br />Table 7: Criteria CUP - <br />STAFF FINDINGS <br />Ke • -criteria applies mining <br />Air quality. Provisions for protection of air <br />quality. Determination of Teller County <br />Environmental Health Officer, or state or federal Not applicable. The limited nature of this <br />agency that operation has no adverse impacts • operation does not affect air quality. <br />or that impacts will be adequately mitigated, will <br />be deemed ode uate miti anon. <br />Air quality. Encourage the protection of the There will be no excessive air pollution generated <br />nei hborhood from excessive air ollutien, • b this o eration. <br />Application. Compliance with all submittal • True <br />re uirements. <br />Application. The representations in the Staff has no knowledge of any inaccuracies fn <br />application are valid. • the re resentations <br />Conditions. Specific conditions of the use need See proposed Conditions of approval. Applicant <br />to be complied with. • must comply with a USFS Plan of Operations and <br /> the re uirements of its DMG reclamation ermit. <br />Drainage. Activity will not adversely affect • True <br />drains a atterns. <br />Drainage. Adequate drainage is or can be • True <br />rovided. <br />Driveways and Access. Location of ingress Location of ingress and egress is determined and <br />and a ress oints. • controlled by the USFS. <br />Dust. Protection of public health by measures Dust control for parking areas will not be required <br />of dust control relative to arkin areas. • b the USFS for this operation. <br />Ecology. Any off-site impacts that might If any, they are controlled by the USFS Plan of <br />potentially affect the ecological balance of the • Operations. <br />surrounding area. <br />Environment. The site exhibits stable True, considering pos!-Hayman Fire revegetation <br />environmental conditions. • natural) occurrin <br />Environment. The site can be developed to <br />minimize disruption of environmentally • True <br />si nificant lands. <br />Erosion. Site can be developed so as not to <br />increase soil erosion from the site during and • True (no construction is proposed) <br />after the construction. <br />Fire. Safety from fire hazard, and measures for • OK - As determined by the USFS. <br />fire control. <br />Flood. Protection of adjacent property from Flood or water damage to adjacent property <br />flood or water dams e. • should not occur from this site. <br />Flood. Site is not prone to flooding. • True <br />Geology. Depth to bedrock is not a factor. • True <br />Hazardous materials. All proposed methods of OK. Contained in USFS Plan of Operations (See <br />handling and storing hazardous materials • draft Environmental Assessment Appendix C <br />, Design Criteria attached as back-up to this Staff <br />including methods of container disposal. Re ort. <br />Hazards. Encourage the protection of Fencing and posting as required by the USFS Plan <br />nei hborhoods from don emus conditions. • of Operations <br />Health. welfare, safety. Such other measures • OK <br />as will secure and protect public health, safety, <br />Colorado Calumet (Dorris)-CUP-00550(06) <br />Planning Commission: July 11, 2006 <br />Tentative BOCC Hearing: August 10, 2006 <br />Stott Report: June 28, 2006 <br />Page 6 of 15 <br />