My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46440
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46440
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:20:01 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:39:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/31/1992
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Midterm Review <br />New Elk Mine (C-81-012) <br />This document presents the results of the Division's Midterm Review of Wyoming <br />Fuel Company's New Elk Mine. This Midterm Review was conducted to fulfill the <br />requirements of Rules 2.08.3, 2.06.2(10), 2.06.3(4), 2.06.5(3), 2.06.7(5), and <br />3.02.2(4). <br />Rule 2.08.3 requires that the Division conduct a review of each permit issued, <br />prior to its midterm (2 1/2 years). The Midterm was due July 1991 but due to <br />drastic workforce reductions, the Midterm is being issued in December, 1992. <br />Based on this review, for good cause shown, the Division may require <br />reasonable revisions or modifications of the permit provisions to ensure <br />compliance with the Act and Regulations. <br />Rules 2.06.2, 2.06.3, 2.06.5 and 2.06.7 require that experimental practices, <br />mountaintop removal variances, variances from approximate original contour <br />(AOC), and variances from contemporaneous reclamation, respectively, be <br />reviewed by the Division where applicable during the Midterm Review. The New <br />Elk Mine does not have any experimental practices or any variances from <br />mountaintop removal, AOC, or from contemporaneous reclamation. <br />Rule 3.02.2(4) requires that the Division review the amount of the bond and <br />the terms of acceptance of the bond every 2 1/2 years. <br />This midterm review consisted of a detailed review of the New Elk Mine permit <br />application and findings document to identify any items that may have been <br />overlooked during the initial review. The Division also reviewed all <br />subsequent revisions and stipulation responses to ensure that all permit <br />commitments and conditions were being followed. Hydrologic monitoring data <br />was reviewed in conjunction with the review of the application to assess the <br />adequacy of the monitoring plan and discussion of hydrologic impacts. <br />problems and observations from past inspection reports were also considered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.