My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-11-12_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1974052
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1974052
>
1996-11-12_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1974052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2023 5:48:44 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:37:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1974052
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/12/1996
Doc Name
REPLY TO STATUS REPORT OF 10/29/96 ON VARRA COMPANIES INC PN M-74-052 PIT 1
From
VARRA COMPANIES INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
` ! ` ' • III I II I i999 IIII III <br /> Varra Companies, Inc. g " <br /> 2130 South 96th Street,Broomfield,CO 80020 (303)666-6657 Fax Number(303)66"743 <br /> Friday 8 November 1996 <br /> PFCE'VEG <br /> Gregg Squire, Environmental Protection Specialist NOV 1 C 7996 <br /> Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology Olvlslon of mineres& Geoiogy <br /> Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br /> 1313 Sherman St., #215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Subject: Reply to your status re ort of 29 October 1996 on the matter of Varra <br /> Companies, In- ermit M74-052 - Pit # . <br /> Dear Mr. Squire: <br /> In order to update you beyond my submittal of 25 October 1996 to the Division of <br /> Water Resources, and to better respond to the concerns expressed in your <br /> correspondence of 29 October 1996, as discussed during our telephone <br /> conference of 4 November 1996, please allow the following to append your <br /> status report as follows: <br /> Problem #1: There are no longer any plans to line the ponds in question. <br /> Should lining occur, no construction would occur beyond the present day <br /> conditions without first obtaining approval from the DMG. <br /> Further, backfilling is intended as previously approved in TR-1. The actual <br /> resolution of this matter is pending resolution of augmentation considerations <br /> with the State Engineer, which the information copied to your office of 25 <br /> October 1996 conveyed. We are very close to resolution. <br /> Problem #2: Resolution of augmentation is close, as my information provided to <br /> your office on 25 October suggests. Last week, I spoke with Bill Maclntyre and <br /> he indicated he was 50% completed with his review. I was hoping to hear from <br /> him by the time of this correspondence. <br /> He indicated the figures looked good. Upon approval, which is expected, we <br /> must gain approval of an accounting method from Bill Gambrel], the Water <br /> Commissioner. Once the accounting is secured, we will submit a proposal to the <br /> City of Lafayete to purchase the winter water we need, which is both available <br /> and affordable. <br /> Once we secure all necessary water, the entire Pit 1 sq[id Dakolios sites will be <br /> properly permitted for all presently exposed groundwater. This means that areas <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.