Laserfiche WebLink
Summary <br />Elk Mine current underground longwall mining <br />activities. MCC holds a permit with the Colorado <br />Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) for the <br />West Elk Mine. The West Elk Mine was opened in <br />1981 and presently produces coal from several <br />existing Federal coal leases. <br />Coal mined at West Elk Mine, as well as from other <br />mines in the North Fork Valley, is a high British <br />Thermal Unit (BTU), low sulfur coal I[ is <br />considered a "clean coal." Its use in industry helps <br />meet standards of the Clean Air Act. As such, there <br />is a demand for coal from the West Elk Mine and <br />other mines in the North Fork Valley for electric <br />power generation. Recovering these Federally- <br />administered coal reserves ensures that they would <br />not be bypassed or rendered inaccessible. <br />The BLM Deciding Official will decide whether or <br />not to offer the Dry Fork LBA tract for competitive <br />leasing under the Mineral Leasing Act, as amended, <br />and Federal regulations under 43 CFR 3400. The <br />BLM Uncompahgre Field Office Manager is <br />responsible for providing the State Director with <br />briefings and recommendations. The Forest Service <br />Responsible Official must decide whether to <br />consent to the BLM offering the tract for lease and <br />what conditions must be prescribed for protection <br />of non-coal resources. <br />The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and <br />Enforcement will prepare the Federal mining plan <br />approval documents for the USDI Assistant <br />Secretary approval. <br />Alternative A: No Action <br />Under the No Action Alternative, the Dry Fork <br />LBA tract would not be offered for competitive sale <br />and no mining would occur in these specific areas. <br />It is assumed that MCC would continue its present <br />coal mining activities at the West Elk Mine. <br />Impacts from mining would not occur on this tract, <br />and the effects from ongoing laud uses would <br />continue. The land would continue to be managed <br />according to Forest Plan standards, goals, and <br />guidelines. <br />Alternative B: Proposed Action <br />The Proposed Action is to consent to leasing NFS <br />lands in the Dry Fork LBA tract for underground <br />development and production of Federal coal <br />reserves, consistent with applicable laws and <br />regulations, including terms and conditions for <br />protecting non-coal resources. <br />ArkLand submitted the Dry Fork LBA for about <br />1,533 acres of Federal coal reserves. The BLM <br />prepared a Tract Delineation Report and accepted <br />the tract boundaries- The BLM calculated the tract <br />acreage to be about 1,517 acres (BLM 2004). <br />Application of the Unsuitability Criteria for Coal <br />Mining described in 43 CFR 3461 did not identify <br />any lands in the tract as being "unsuitable" <br />according to the criteria. Some restrictions were <br />identified to except some of the criteria. These <br />restrictions will be carried forward as stipulations <br />on the coal lease. <br />Reasonably Foreseeable Mining Plan and <br />Foreseeable Surface Use <br />To analyze potential surface impacts due to <br />underground mine subsidence, this DEIS assumes a <br />Reasonably Foreseeable Mine Plan (RFMP) for this <br />leasing decision. In order to effectively analyze <br />potential post-lease activities on the land surface, <br />the DEIS also assumes a scenario of potential <br />surface use. It must be noted however, that <br />decisions pertaining to surface use and disturbance, <br />with the exception of subsidence impacts, are no[ <br />made at the leasing stage. Rather, the decisions <br />related to post-lease surface activities are made <br />when and if site-specific surface use proposals are <br />made, and are evaluated under National <br />Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) based on their <br />own merits. <br />Reasonably Foreseeable Mine Plan <br />The Dry Fork LBA contains an esiima[ed 17 <br />million tons of Federal coal reserves in the B and E <br />Seams. For this analysis, it is assumed that the coal <br />would be recovered using the longwall method of <br />underground coal mining. The tract is bounded on <br />the north and west by currently leased Federal coal, <br />on the east by unmineable (thin) coal, and on the <br />south by inferred mineable coal (unleased) (BLM <br />S-2 Dry Fork Lease-By-Application DEIS <br />