My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46211
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:17:39 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:27:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/25/2005
Doc Name
Draft EIS Dry Fork Lease
From
US Forest Service
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 2 <br />Alternatives <br />During EIS preparation, follow only the <br />guidelines for construction in "roadless <br />areas" that were in effect during the time of <br />submittal. <br />The Forest Service is currently managing road <br />constmction activities in IRAs according to an <br />agency Interim Directive (1920-2004-1) issued in <br />July 2004. This directive must be applied to all <br />activities in IRAs for which NEPA decisions are <br />made afrer the effective date of the directive. <br />Analyze impacts to agriculture, specifically <br />along the Minnesota Creek corridor. <br />The Minnesota Creek corridor is outside the <br />cumulative impact area for this coal leasing <br />analysis. <br />Discuss current and projected road <br />management and closures. <br />This issue is outside the scope of the leasing <br />analysis. Where road management may have <br />cumulative effects, an analysis occurs in the <br />cumulative effects sections. <br />Complete the NEPA process in an efficient <br />and timely manner. <br />The EIS is prepared according to all applicable <br />laws, NEPA guidelines, and agency direction. <br />Address impacts (from methane venting) to air <br />quality, global climate change, West Elk <br />Wilderness Area, and national resources. <br />Methane venting is not part of the Proposed Action. <br />Impacts related to reasonably foreseeable future <br />actions that may involve methane venting are <br />discussed in the cumulative effects sections. <br />Provide information on stage 5 old growth. <br />To the Forest Service's knowledge, no old growth <br />that would be classified as stage 5 is present in the <br />Dry Fork LBA area. <br />2.4 ALTERNATIVE A: <br />NO ACTION <br />Under the No Action alternative, the Dry Fork LBA <br />tract would not be offered for competitive sale and <br />no mining would occur in these specific areas. It is <br />assumed that MCC would continue its present coal <br />mining activities at the West Elk Mine. <br />Impacts from mining would not occur on this tract, <br />and the effects from ongoing land uses would <br />continue. The land would continue to be managed <br />according to Forest Plan standards, goals, and <br />guidelines. <br />2.5 ALTERNATIVE B: <br />PROPOSED ACTION <br />The Proposed Action is consent to lease NFS lands <br />in the Dry Fork LBA tract for underground <br />development and production of Federal coal <br />reserves, consistent with applicable laws and <br />regulations, including terms and conditions for <br />protecting non-coal resources. <br />The Dry Fork LBA tract as delineated by the BLM <br />would be offered for lease by competitive bid. The <br />tract would be offered with special coal lease <br />stipulations for the protection of non-coal resources <br />as determined through the NEPA process, in <br />addition to the BLM Standard Lease Terms, and <br />terms of the Standard Stipulation for Lands under <br />the Jurisdiction of the USDA (see Appendix C). <br />This alternative assumes that the successful bidder <br />would extract coal in the lease tract using <br />underground longwall methods (see Section 1.8.1). <br />Discuss reclamation (bonding, native species). <br />The CDMG oversees coal mining activity in <br />Colorado. The mines are required to have State- <br />approved mine permits. The State levies and <br />administers all the reclamation bonds. The bonding <br />Level is determined at the time a mine permit is <br />issued or revised, and is not part of the leasing <br />analysis (see Section 1.3). <br />2.5.1 Design Features of the Proposed <br />Action <br />The Proposed Action includes conditions for <br />protection of non-coal resources in the form of lease <br />stipulations derived from restrictions developed <br />from application of the Coal Unsuitability Criteria <br />Dry Fork Lease-ey-Application DEIS 2-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.