My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46211
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:17:39 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:27:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/25/2005
Doc Name
Draft EIS Dry Fork Lease
From
US Forest Service
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Purpose and Need <br />Chapter 1 <br />lease boundaries. Therefore, although it is not <br />anticipated that the B Seam reserves would be <br />mined at this time, the RFMP includes a projection <br />for eventually mining in the B Seam. The B Seam <br />coal in the Dry Fork LBA may be mineable in the <br />northwestern portion of the tract. Longwall panels <br />would likely extend into these reserves from the <br />northwest. The RFMP assumes the B Seam coal in <br />the Dry Fork LBA tract would be mined between <br />2015 and 2016. The B Seam coal reserves <br />represent about 14 months of additional coal <br />reserves based on the rate of mining cuttently <br />employed at the West Elk Mine. [f the B Seam <br />were ever to be mined, it is presumed that it would <br />be mined in a similar fashion to the E Seam, from <br />the existing mine, and using existing facilities. <br />The RFMP assumes a Longwall panel configuration <br />that would cross Deep Creek and the Dry Fork of <br />Minnesota Creek perpendicularly to obliquely. The <br />RFMP was used to develop the coal mine <br />subsidence prediction used to assess potential <br />surface resource impacts. A detailed subsidence <br />evaluation appears as Appendix B ofthe DEIS. <br />1.8.2 Reasonably Foreseeable Post- <br />lease Surface Use <br />In recent years, coal mines operating in the <br />Somerset coal field have experienced build-up of <br />methane gas in the underground workings after the <br />rock strata have subsided due to mining (see <br />Subsidence Evaluation, Appendix B). Under <br />Mining, Safety and Health Administration <br />regulations, mines are required to maintain methane <br />levels at or below about one percent to ensure <br />worker safety underground. Typically, the mine <br />ventilation system cannot effectively keep methane <br />levels within safe working range, therefore <br />additional methane liberation methods are often <br />used. <br />For mining on existing leases north of the Dry Fork <br />LBA tract, the West Elk Mine has used a system of <br />MDWs to assist in liberating methane from the <br />underground mine. These wells are drilled from the <br />land surface into the mine workings and use an <br />exhausting pump to pull gas from the mine. <br />Drilling these methane drainage wells requires <br />construction of drill pads and temporary roads on <br />the land surface. These features are on the <br />landscape for [wo to six years, after which they are <br />decommissioned, and the land surface is reclaimed <br />and returned to pre-mining land uses. Reclamation <br />includes returning land surface to approximate <br />original contour and revegetating. Reclamation has <br />been generally successful within two to five yeazs <br />after reclamation work is completed. <br />For the Dry Fork LBA tract, it is anticipated that <br />methane drainage wells may be needed. Other post- <br />leasing surface disturbance that could be reasonably <br />anticipated include exploration drilling, seismic <br />exploration, groundwater monitor well installation, <br />ventilation and escapeway facilities, water handling <br />facilities, subsidence and hydrology monitoring <br />facilities, and access roads needed for these <br />facilities (MCC 2003). Estimated acres by <br />alternative are shown in Table 1-1. For the <br />purposes of the effects analyses in this EIS, it is <br />assumed that surface disturbance would occur <br />periodically over the life of the lease (expected to <br />be about 25 years from lease issuance to lease <br />relinquishment and final bond release). Site- <br />specific locations of anticipated disturbance cannot <br />be identified at the leasing stage, due to the <br />competitive nature of coal leasing and the fact that a <br />final mine operations plan has not been approved <br />(see Section 1.3 Leasing Process, Authorizing Acts <br />and Relevant Policies, Plans and Programs). <br />Table 1-1 <br />Reasonably Foreseeable Surface Use <br />Activity AIL <br />B Alt. <br />C <br />MDW (number of) 30 22 <br />MDW (acres) 30 22 <br />Miles of temporary roads for MDW 4.4 2.9 <br />Temporary roads for MDW access <br />(acres) <br />16 <br />11 <br />Acres for ventilation (acres) 5 5 <br />Access for ventilation (acres) 3.5 3.5 <br />Total rounded acres 60 43 <br />MDW =Methane Drainage WeIIs <br />For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that <br />about 30 MDWs would be needed over the life of <br />the lease, assuming about one acre of disturbance <br />1-8 Dry Fork Lease-By-Application DEIS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.