Laserfiche WebLink
Alluvial Valley Floors (AVF) <br />• The AVF's identified in the vicinity of the Trapper Mines are the Yampa River, <br />the Williams Fork River, and Fiume Gulch. The potential. for each of these to <br />be impacted by the proposed mining operations is discuse:ed below. <br />The potential for the Yampa River AVF to be impacted by the proposed mining <br />operations is probably negligible. Generally, the Yampa River Ai'F receives <br />very little of its water supply (both ground water and surface water) from the <br />proposed mine area. The majority of the flow in [he river and the alluvial <br />aquifer comes from the headwater portions of the drainage. The applicant <br />states [ha[ the contributions of surface water from the T. rapper Ptine is <br />insignificant and is estimated a[ 0.07 cfs/miz. Further, the ground water <br />contribution to the base flow of the Yampa River is undetectable. This is <br />substantiated by seepage, run, and potentiometric studies which basically show <br />the following: 1) the Yampa River loses surface water flow to the alluvial <br />aquifer as it flows past the mine area, and 2) the Yampa alluvial aquifer is <br />hydraulically isolated from the bedrock aquifer of [he Williams Fork <br />Formation. In addition, all disturbance related to the proposed mine is <br />located at least one mile from the southern boundary of :he Yampa River AVF. <br />Therefore, it is very unlikely that the Yampa River AVF will be Impacted by <br />the proposed mining operations. <br />The potential for the Williams Fork River AVF to be impacted by the proposed <br />mining operation is also negligible. The Williams Fork diver is located on <br />the opposite side of a major drainage divide from the Trsipper Mine. All <br />drainage, both surface water and ground water, flows away from the Yilliams <br />Fork and towards the Yampa P.iver. Furthermore, the stra[:a to be affected by <br />the proposed mining operations outcrop on the Yampa River side of the drainage <br />• divide. In addition, no mining-related disturbance is proposed in the <br />Williams Fork River drainage area. Therefore, the Williams Fork River AVF <br />should not be impacted by the proposed mining operations. <br />The other AVF within the mine plan boundary is about 50 acres along Flume <br />Gulch. This is the upstream end of the drainage and is only used for <br />grazing. No mining disturbance covered under the proposed 5-year permit term <br />is located within the Flume Gulch drainage area. Mining activities will not <br />disturb any portion of the drainage area until the next 5-year permit term. <br />In addition, because of the dip of the strata, all ground water flow from the <br />mine area is directed deep beneath all the small drainages in the vicinity of <br />the mine. Therefore, the proposed mining operations in this 5-year permit <br />term should not impact the Flume Gulch AVF. However, because of the potential <br />for impacts due to mining exists for Flume Gulch during the life of the mine, <br />the applicant has committed to hydrologic monitoring of Flume Gulch. The <br />monitoring plan contained in section 4.8.5.1 of the MF.P wall be adequate in <br />detecting any mining-related impacts upon Flume Gulch. The MRP does not <br />include any information as to the nature of disturbance in this area during <br />the next 5-year permit term. <br />-14- <br />• <br />