My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46036
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:16:49 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:16:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/14/1983
Doc Name
Amended Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-33- <br />The cumulative effect of impounding water in sediment ponds at all three <br />mines will also be insignificant. Because of the small relative surface <br />disturbance at each mine, pond storage volumes are likewise small and <br />sedimentation ponds at all mines are dewatered within 72 hours to <br />minimize any water loss to the hydrologic system. <br />The total worse case depletion to the Roaring Fork River by mine inflows <br />is small. If all mine inflows were consumed and not discharged back to <br />the receiving stream, a total of 456 acre-feet/year would be depleted <br />from the Roaring Fork. This is only 0.06% of the total flow. Even <br />during the low flow of 179 cfs for the period of record on Roaring Fork, <br />the total depletion would be 0.4%. This amount is insignificant to the <br />surface water system. (Refer to Table 4.) <br />The impact of all mine discharges on the salt load to the Roaring Fork <br />River can be calculated assuming a worse case mine discharge and average <br />salt content. The total salt load to the Roaring Fork River at Glenwood <br />Springs from mine discharges would be increased by 2.2 mg/l. This is <br />0.8°~ of the mean annual salt load normally carried by the Roaring Fork <br />River. This should not cause any measurable change in the water quality <br />of the Roaring fork River. <br />The mine discharges are not anticipated to change the ionic <br />characteristics of the Roaring Fork River. Total discharges are a small <br />portion of total flow (0.06% mean annual), and do not exhibit <br />significantly different characteristics. Trace elements and heavy metals <br />are also not found in any high concentrations which would affect the <br />quality in the Roaring Fork River. Any elevated levels will be diluted. <br />The Division finds that pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(c)the proposed <br />operation will minimize effects to the prevailing hydrologic balance; and <br />is designed to prevent damage to the hydrologic balance outside the <br />proposed permit area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.