Laserfiche WebLink
Interoffice <br />MEMORANDUM <br />to: Byron Walker , <br />from: Kent Gorham <br />subj: Collum Baseline Field Notes, Colowyo, C-80-006 <br />date: September 30, 2004 <br />These are my field notes and thoughts concerning the DMG/Colowyo baseline field inspection of <br />the proposed Collum expansion area at the Colowyo Mine. The digital photographs I took during <br />the inspection can be found, named as referenced in the text of this document, in <br />m/coal/kag/ground insp photos/2004 Colowyo baseline. <br />The inspection began after meeting Colowyo representatives at the main gate of the existing <br />operation. In attendance were Tae, Brant, Crellin Scott, and Jerry Rowe. Representing the <br />Division during the inspection were Byron Walker, Dan Hernandez, Janet Binns, and me. We <br />proceeded to the Gossard house where we briefly reviewed large oblique aerial photographs. <br />We then proceeded to the northeast corner of the permit area along Jubb Creek (pic Jubb), <br />where we inspected the stream channel. We proceeded south, entering the pit area along <br />exploration roads. We stopped about'/z mile north of the pit area at a high spot (pic pit area). <br />Six drill rigs were on site at various locations. Exploration pads consisted of windrowed topsoil <br />and mild leveling off the pad. Sediment control and topsoil markers, if required, were not <br />observed. We stopped at hole 19, which is the approximate northern mining limit of Phase I/II. <br />We dropped into Little Collum Gulch where a well was located. This well pumps water up to <br />steel tanks both east and west of the Gulch. Water is then directed to livestock tanks (large tires <br />and dug ponds) through a series of valves and pipelines. This well was approximately 130 feet <br />deep according to Brant. The electrical conductivity (EC), as measured by the DMG was 1000 <br />umhos/cm. Production exceeds 45 gallons per minute. It is not known whether this is a <br />permitted well. Little Collum Gulch at this location is steep-sided and straight. <br />We then proceeded to the southern limit of mining along Little Collum (pic south limit). Elk were <br />bugling about'/< mile to the south in the aspen forest. Stock ponds constructed in the upper <br />reaches of Little Collum were dry. We then drove down the slope through the proposed pit area <br />and had lunch in Collum Gulch in SE 1/4 of section 23, T4N, R94W. Willow grows next to the <br />stream channel in this location. Upstream of where the road crosses the stream, the valley <br />bottom is narrow and any farmable area is negligible (pic above Collum AVF). After lunch, we <br />proceeded a short distance down Collum Gulch, in the area that had been previously identified <br />by the OSM as potentially irrigable based on water availability sufficient for irrigation <br />development consistent with regional agricultural practices. This area is much wider than many <br />of the other canyon floors we visited up to that time. Water was flowing in the stream at 10-20 <br />gallons per minute, maybe up to 30 gpm. The EC of the water measured 1000 umhos/cm. <br />Remnants of Crested wheatgrass plants were observed growing in the pasture at this location. <br />This species is introduced and may indicate a previous attempt to irrigate and/or improve the <br />vegetation along the valley floor. Byron noted the presence of a shallow, linear feature running <br />approximately along contour that could be an abandoned irrigation ditch. It could also be an old <br />roadbed. It is my opinion that this is an area that definitely requires more study to determine if it <br />is indeed an AVF. I verbally conveyed this thought to Jerry and Crellin. It is likely that this area <br />