Laserfiche WebLink
)N~y .f <br />with minimal damage and risk to i <br />motorists. <br />A mitigation plan was devel- <br />oped that addressed responsibility <br />for maintaining the road during the <br />subsidence and signs that warned <br />motorists of subsidence area and <br />possible rough road. Again,survey- <br />ing was an important part of the <br />data collection. ]t showed the ef- <br />fects to the county road in the west- <br />ern mining district and then pro- <br />jected the subsidence impact where <br />the long panels were proposed. <br />cepted by the owner and the regulatory agency for per- <br />mit approval. <br />Ln the first two long panels, both types of mitigation <br />have been used where [he track is brought back [o origi- <br />nalgrade and where the new grades after subsidence are <br />within acceptable limits. The primary driver in the miti- <br />gation plan is the daily surr•eying of the track profile and <br />comparisons with predicted subsidence. This determines <br />how much track leveling and grading are required to <br />maintain grades. <br />County road. A 9-m- (30-(t-) wide paved county <br />road traverses the EMD. It is designed for light traffic. <br />The permit process for the county was primarily based <br />on traffic patterns and motorists' safety. <br />Communication with the road maintenance supervi- <br />sors began in the western mining district where a small <br />section of road was undermined by the longwall opera- <br />tion. This showed that the road could be undermined <br />Ventilation <br />A key factor in the early design <br />layout of the long panels for long- <br />wall mining was providing adequate <br />ventilation and safe escape routes <br />for the miners. The first step in the <br />mine ventilation design was an up- <br />dated mine ventilation survey. <br />T'he survey and subsequent <br />model development were conducted <br />with the assistance of a third party <br />contractor. This allowed for a check <br />against ventilation models devel- <br />oped in-house. It also gave credence to regulatory sub- <br />mittals whereby the long panels could be safely venti- <br />lated. <br />One early discovery was that the past practice of <br />ventilating the belt entry to return would not be possible <br />at the proposed length. The mine had an existing peti- <br />tion for modification where belt air could be directed to <br />the face. However, it was realized that dust control <br />would need to be properly managed. As a result of the <br />ventilation modeling, a second main fan was put on line <br />to increase the ventilation capacity. <br />The bleeder system design was developed with ven- <br />tilation and escapeway goals in mind. The design uses <br />return and intake air in the bleeder systems (Fg. 7). A <br />I:?2-m- (oft-) diam shaft was developed a[ [he back of <br />the longwall panels to handle return air from [he gob <br />and seal areas. A second 1.52-m- (5-ft-) diam shaft was <br />installed about 23 m (75 ft) south of the return shaft (or <br />intake air. <br />7'he intake <br />shaft was de- <br />signed with an <br />PISti CRt~nvF t ~ elevator system <br />Rgl~pgp SCR ((// Cor escape pur- <br />000NTYROAD poses. And a <br />~ blowing fan was <br />WESTERN NING DI5T12f(.T FIG. 4 <br />~w~., M,,: - :~ <br />~ Eastern mining <br />district with <br />surface <br />FA~ERN MINING DISTPJCr features suhject <br />Powell uNeS to subsidence <br />/i from the <br />longwall <br />FOIDEt CREW nuf mining. <br />24 DECEMBER 1998 ^ MINING ENGINEERING <br />FIG. 3 <br />Reserve houndary limits that led to the idea for long panels for longwall mining. <br />