My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL45973
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL45973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:16:35 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
MAGAZINE CLIPPING
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w..:.,rrl.n~ <br />1982 and was subsequently purchased by Cyprus Miner- <br />als in 1485. <br />Tn 19R9, Cyprus Coal det:ided to install a longwalt <br />system on the west side of the main entries. The initial <br />Inngwall mining district and first nine panels were re- <br />treated from 2489 to 1946 at an average length of 3.000 <br />m (1QOi10 ft) (Fig. 1). L,ongwail productivity increased <br />it10`.6 during that time because the operation continually <br />improved. And the face was widened from 195 to 256 m <br />(640 to 840 ft) far the last faur panels. <br />In 1492,TCC recognized that to remain competitive <br />In the western coal market, a new mine plan was re- <br />quired because the InngwaTt would move Crnm [he west- <br />ern to the eastern portion of the reserve. The strategy <br />was to prepare the operation for the expiration of a <br />h[ghet priced contract and continue the longwalt mining <br />m the eastern and northern sections of the reserve (Fig, <br />2) The Inngwall panel configuratians in the eastern area <br />were not conducive to lower cash costs. This was due to <br />the number of longwalt moves, steep grades and the re- <br />yunement to not subside the ailurial valley floor (AVF) <br />and several surface structures. <br />T'he drive to reduce costs and remain competitive in <br />the western coal market led to the development of a <br />cam approach to redesigning the mine plan. The <br />Cyprus Coal ColoradolSouthern Wyoming Business <br />[Jm[ Technical Services Department began looking at <br />the enure underground reserve in a different view,where <br />boundaries were removed. The removal of boundaries <br />and input from the engineering stall within Cyprus Coal <br />led to the concept of 6.700 m (22,000 ft) longwalt panels <br />in the eastern mining district tEMU) of the remaining <br />reserves <br />The key to the new mine plan was that the barriers <br />of the steep grades, AVF, subsidence of surface struc- <br />tures, ventilation and conveyance design, and all the un- <br />dergroundsubsystems for longwalt mining in iongpanels <br />had to be specially designed. Many of these issues re- <br />quired new techniques and engineering that had got <br />been previously attempted in longwalt mines. <br />Design and layout <br />The reserve boundary limits led to the concept that <br />long panels could be physically laid nut for longwalt min- <br />ing (Fig. 3). This was based on the ability to engineer <br />through any barriers established by the steep grades, <br />which decrease to the east. The reserve analysis to the <br />east of the steep grades showed good thickness along <br />with coat quality tar 4,875 m (16,0(10 Ft) before tapering <br />into a parting agd fauhed area. <br />TCC had struggled with grnund conditions through- <br />out the western portion of the reserve. The roof rock <br />there wus 0.3 to 0.6 m (i to 2 ft) of weak shale.and would <br />tat! in on continuous miner development. Tl was deteo- <br />mined that certain entries and x-cuts developed in the <br />western bh:cders at a 45° angle off the principal horizon• <br />tat stress held up the mnf rock. Therefore, when laying <br />out the panels in the EMD, an orientation of. 45` oft the <br />principal horizontal stress was used to maximize recov- <br />ery in the reserve. <br />Another advantagt of the proposed layout was the <br />use of existing main entries for pane! gateroads This re- <br />duced contiguous miner and capital costs. <br />The panel layout was first proposed and reviewed by <br />engineering and aperations. Obstacles were then listed <br />and timelines established for engineering and permitting. <br />The obstacles included surface features for subsidence. <br />coat leases, ventilation and escapeways, conveyance and <br />equipment design life. <br />A gantt chart was established listing alt the criteria <br />for the startup of the first longwaU panel. 't'ile criteria <br />were then assigned responsibility for completion andJnr <br />management of the tasks This step was critical because <br />it established all of the key dates far the completion of <br />major issues, such as permitting, <br />mine plan sequencing. engineering <br />subsystems and equipment design. <br />It was realized early nn that many of <br />the issues or criteria were new eon• <br />cepts that required additional time <br />and analysis. <br />Surface features <br />The key surface features of <br />structures that were going to be sub <br />sided included a set of two AVP ar <br />eas, three major power lines, th railroad spur to the mine, a county <br />read and a few smaII structures (Pig <br />4). <br />astern mining district at Twentymila Coal. <br />Cyprus Twentymiie Coal's surface feeilitiez near Oak Creek, CO.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.