pa usr25 ~yyy
<br />ginutes/franscri t - rovide access roads for
<br />ect down there. So it carne to the board to
<br />wanting to use somesu ,hat material to P not to sell it, but
<br />Blasi was actually to give the material away, So I think with
<br />So at that time Mr~ and the[ became a bit of a touchy okay ro erty •
<br />and the board had indicated that it w
<br />landowners into their property,
<br />to do that, and now he is the owner of the p
<br />find if it's okay wort of the property ro eRy, the
<br />eak about what his intentions are lease. urchased the p P
<br />at that time Mr. Blast was y~atlet him sp ourself for the record, hrnoving, and I p
<br />Blasi, would you identify y ors Ranch for
<br />that I'll corn tt over to him Blasi Truckin€ gt Eart and the
<br />PAULIN: MT Blasi with Anthony with the POA thQ eatYMthat I own,
<br />BLAST: I'm Anthony
<br />000 ton of material left on-site on the p P and I don t intend on
<br />lot these at Majors Ranch, and I also have a maintenance cODtt s of the members.
<br />nd there's about 6, sociacion,
<br />maintaining the roads, a sot that's left is right
<br />wants to buy it for their roads and also for ddvewa 11e is removed
<br />association more mining there because of tfie covenants of the as
<br />disturbed area has been reclaimed. The on y P
<br />pod 1 cannot do any ieviously e to soil there that once the p
<br />more mining- All the p 150 square feet. There's som tlep one. me to get rid of the
<br />doing any and it's probably et the p g is forcing don t want
<br />where this gravel Bile is, soil and reseed it and g nd so they
<br />Drill see on tfiis one lave nfe im tY m,
<br />then I would go ahead and spread the top vVO ears to do it, a
<br />bets of the association, as y esore, and they g
<br />The mem want to g° ahead and use the matertal on the roads if I could ore of all
<br />e don t want it there because it's an ey ertrtitted. to drip
<br />pile. Th Y with it. They netting ¢ P „Mr, Blasi agrees
<br />it or do anything is exception from ~ avel at the
<br />me to bury the memorandum to yO4the rigfit to remove the gr
<br />them, and that's what I was seeking a ors Ranch --
<br />e ou.
<br />pAULIN: In the letter from M ] to ~ used
<br />Lot 31 within 2A months. After that time the lls ernovenit and charg Y
<br />gravel Phase 1, re saying tf y°u dOn t remove it, Y avel's going
<br />owner s expense" They' tlta way I understand it, the gr
<br />Chairman,
<br />BLASI: Right. I understand it -Mr~
<br />STARNER~ The way erring paid for it.
<br />ro erty. ro erty. It's just youse g uestion is. Also
<br />on the original p P sir, to ~ used on the p P That's where the q
<br />BLASI: Right, yes. punt of time and we got
<br />STARKER: S° rt's still gO1Pgnot the owner of the other propettY~
<br />BLASI: Rigfit. Because, I'm
<br />has contacted me and stied that if thatQ s mar for theuvown roads ertain - that
<br />urchasina using material off
<br />Iiuerfano County would be interested in p ~ pre they
<br />exempt on it that they other questions? the roads in the interim. u there is
<br />PAULIN' AnY been maintaining it all the way P
<br />JAVERNICK• How have they somewhere else? W alsenburg and hauling
<br />been getting gravel from ermined pit from what I could sell it to them right
<br />it from a P than, of course,
<br />pile or have they Ye been buying a lot more money
<br />BLA51: They it, and it's costing tfiis transaction?
<br />the way they've been doing to be affected by
<br />RKICK: There's an operator in W alsenburg that's going
<br />there a,Ad~eltver rt on-site. eve them an
<br />BLASI: Probably, Yeah.
<br />Okay. uess I door ~°"'
<br />JAVERNICK~ I remember the Rhd Sra l~ to bi differentttwisL I g
<br />PAULIN: Bruce, how does this -- on and Tony • • ~ arcel of
<br />used °n that. You know vJttat do Y ~` but
<br />our tecommehdation • terials ate used on the same p
<br />exemption because it was being o else.
<br />art what the board has said a that ma
<br />ensa[ion, and that compensation factor has been rern°
<br />quite how I think aboutit`h ~ att the P nin operation or something
<br />1q~PgRIES: a tie into no comp been. Is it a rtu g o eration.
<br />art there was eration has
<br />propeRY• a°d t° the p intent is really not a mi uazantee of that
<br />looked at what the intent of the oP not really --
<br />an activity
<br />still the board has Ding to be reclamati°n at the site. Is there same
<br />You know, a dtsturbance that's caused, will be hauled off-site.
<br />ve looked at is there g for sure. If material is used
<br />Also they' was sold to the county, finally.
<br />reclamation They've also looked at whether or not materia anted to Red Creek Ranch origou know the entire thing
<br />I think I would be a little bucri ~~ what he board gr ed prom where it was, Y re maintaining the
<br />thong it at no post. that they' then it's
<br />on-site, it seems to tit in pretty ping _ I mean the site has were providing es over a section,
<br />PAULIN; But the only we were told tfiey but then when he tak
<br />whether that was the case, Ding
<br />they were providing, and if I teme owing
<br />roads, which we have no way of kn hauled off. otten rid of.
<br />Yeah, and the other fact o sittSng dds a little bit diffone nt twist to it is he s no nt there for use m
<br />not really being °$~ pD-site. It's being there that needs to be g
<br />glJ(v1PHRIES file the file rese
<br />the material. It's a stocky and there is a topsoil stocky P
<br />and extracting ICs got to be removed before the teclaritation can e
<br />PAULIN: Just to add, the Pit has been reclaimed,
<br />vrpI,DRON:
<br />
|