Laserfiche WebLink
TRR.P,PER MINING INC TEL:303-824-4632 Jan 04 <br />D <br /> <br />STATE OF 96 13:35 No.005 P.08 <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />sss <br />COLORADO <br /> <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY _ <br />_ <br />' <br /> <br />Ih~artment of Natural kesources ,_ <br />a ~ <br /> <br />1113 Shcnnan SL, Room 215 ' <br />~ <br />DMYM, CO 80203 +4 <br />+ <br />Vhunc: 1303) UL4-3567 ~.!?s+ <br />FAX; (3031 fl37-8106 Itn, kmm~i <br /> C.ove,nor <br />' ~ Mlthacl B. LonN <br /> <br />November 25, 1992 Division 1)in+sw <br />Jim Mattern <br />Trapper Mining Inc. <br />P.O. Box 187 <br />Craig, CO 81626 <br />Dear Mr. Mattern, <br />The Division received your letter dated November 19, 1992 regarding <br />the summary of agreements reached at the meeting. The memo clearly <br />defines the necessary information needed by the Division and/or <br />Trapper Mine. <br />The Division has a.response to the Following concerns: <br />Backfillina and Rough Grading <br />As agreed upon between the Division and Trapper Mine, additional <br />contractors would be contacted regarding equipment selection (D10N <br />Dozers vs. D11N Dozers), and the number of shifts used on site. Of <br />the 6 agreed upon contractors, the Division contacted all but <br />Granite Construction and Tarco. The Division's survey included <br />Morrison & Knudson, Srown 6 Root, Greens, and Ames Construction. <br />The general consensus regarding equipment selection is that D10N'. <br />Dozers would be the first choice for the project the size of <br />Trapper. Some contractors such as Brown ~ Root would be willing to <br />purchase a Dil Dozer if that is what the job required. The other <br />contractors statod that they would not use or buy D11N Dozers <br />because they are too large and do not accommodate the typical earth <br />moving job. D11N Dozers are not economically feasible because <br />there is too much down time in between jobs. D11N dozers were also <br />described as "few and Par between". It was the general consensus <br />among the contractors that DlON Dozers are more accessible than <br />D11N Dozers. <br />There was, however, one contractor that statefl that D11N Dozers <br />were available. Based on this information, the 'Division Peels that <br />Trapper should be entitled to use the coat of D11N Dozers in the <br />estimate. The Division estimated the usage of D11N Dozers compared <br />to D10N Dozers, and felt that the Division would have sufficient <br />funds if D11N Dozers were used in the estimate. The Division will <br />allow the cost for D11N Dozers in the estimate at the cost of <br />$214.15 on a double shift and $254.98 on a single shift. <br />