Laserfiche WebLink
JO NN C. GOP]VCN <br />or LO VNSCL <br />rw[DeR¢ L. uwms <br />LEONARD N. CRYPB[LL <br />POSLOC WALK Cw,JR. <br />C Y.PLC! C.OPOVCR <br />J ONN L. rCwp V9OM <br />JAY C! N.TVRNCR <br />Y. G 14GCNC[ <br />C NAPL[! C. RNTMC' <br />C L CCRCRN AM ' <br />JONN S. vr[Ir![R <br />PIC NARD e. MAwvn <br />JOlCPM Y.MO MTAYO <br />BCNY CTi 1. All CNBCRG <br />TCwPT Np el[ nlRC <br />Jp NM J. YUL LIM 1. JR. <br />R CMN CTN G. CNRIl TIM1MBSCM <br />DAVID R. DOR9VCN <br />POe[RT [. wRR w[N.JR. <br />STC PN[N A.w UNST [IN <br />wOBC RT J. RAPCLRC <br />rRCO CRICK O. JOLICT <br />vNILIP c RIm [!fL <br />• <br />• <br />GORSUCH, KIRGIS, CAMPBELL,WALKER AND GROVER <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />1200 AMERICAN NATIO N4L 6ANN BUILDING <br />BIB SEVENTEENTH STREET <br />D ENVER,COLORADO 80202 <br />TELEPHONE 703/534-1200 <br />TWx 910/931-OaSB <br />November 16, 1978 <br />Belmore T. Martin, Esq. <br />Suite 814 <br />Equitable Building <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br />Re: The Robinson Brick & Tile <br />Company South Chieftain Mine <br />Dear B.T.: <br />iii iiiiuiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />JONN J. AI40.JR. <br />C. wILLIND CRO wNf <br />PANCLI Y YAPTIN <br />sT[PNex N pvxCAN <br />OAV ID Y. PO..'C LL <br />ROBCRT f WILlON <br />WILLIAM N. YC[w1N <br />$TC PNCM RL CIM <br />R[IlN M. CPOVCM <br />JAM C! A.JACLOMlRI <br />CNARLes w. M<D[RMOTT <br />BRIAN T. C.LM Pe[LL <br />YIC NICL J. W10LC <br />CO WARD IMATI MI <br />C Nt RTL OVTCRBRIOOC <br />GARY l.CONCM <br />CLIMTOM P. lMIIT <br />WIL CT T OA MICL <br />BAwBARA S. BAx Re <br />BPVCC J. MEAD MER <br />LAWPEMCC P. TCRP CLL <br />l NATNC M.MAO SfN <br />•LLCM O. VOTM <br />CVC M.Nf RMOVIlT <br />JAMfl A. RUC. JR. <br />RCM OM P. COLV ERT <br />iPCC11L COYxlLL <br />This is to confirm our telephone conversation of earlier <br />today. We would like to meet with you and Roger Funston of <br />the Mined Land Reclamation Staff to discuss the concerns the <br />City of Lakewood has with respect to the following matters: <br />1. The potential opening of Aquifers and the liability <br />of the City if drainage problems result therefrom. <br />2. [4hether a policy could be established where park <br />land would be used for mining only once, i.e., total <br />extractionr at which time the lease would be assigned <br />to the City so that it would no longer be worked. <br />3. Participation by the City in approving plans for <br />proposed final grading for the area to be mined. <br />4. The legal description in Exhibit A of the permit <br />:, application includes approximately 1500 acres while <br />other parts of the permit application indicate only <br />6 acres will be affected by the oueration. <br />5. l9hether the City could limit access to Alameda and <br />be assured it would be held harmless for accidents <br />involving users of the City's parks. <br />