Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF <br />RADO <br />DIVISION OE MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone. 1303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />DATE: July 31, 2000 <br />TO: Bob Oswald <br />FROM: Allen Sorenson <br />RE: Highwall Stability, Gunnison Gravel, Dickerson Pit, Permit No.1VI-78-305 <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />GregE Walther <br />Executive Director <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />The proposed mine plan for the Dickerson Pit would leave a 200 foot high quarry face with an overall <br />slope of 1:1 by creating five 40 foot'/::1 highwalls and 20 foot wide catch benches. Geologic <br />information provided aze statements from Celia Greenman of the Co]orado Geological Survey that the <br />unweathered granite and West Elk Breccia exposed in the pit are "very resistant, hazd rock." Ms. <br />Greenman did not evaluate the weathered and decomposed granite or the quartzite that are also present <br />in the quarry. The Rules of the Mined Land Reclamation Boazd require that "If not eliminated, all <br />highwalls shall be stabilized," (Rule 3.1.5(3)). The information provided by Gunnison Gravel fo this <br />point is insufficient to make a determination that the proposed final highwall configuration will be <br />stable. This memorandum outlines the type of information that will be required. <br />The Division of Minerals and Geology must make a finding that the geologic conditions in the <br />weathered and unweathered granite and the West Elk Breccia of the Dickerson Pit are favorable for <br />steep pit slopes in order to approve the final configuration proposed by the Operator. Favorable <br />geologic conditions relate not only to the nature of the intact rock, but also to the aspect of the final <br />highwall the orientation and condition of the geolo>ic structure,-and to the excavation practices used to <br />create the final highwall. To facilitate a finding by the Division that conditions are favorable and to <br />approve the highwall proposal, certain geologic investigations are required. <br />Fracture mapping is required to evaluate the influence of natural fracture weakness in relation to the <br />intact rock. Natural fractures, joints, faults, and foliation normally control slope failure in rock <br />slopes..Adverse orientation of these structures occurs when down dipping fractures or fracture <br />wedges daylight in a highwall. This condition is illustrated in the attached figure 1. The Operator <br />must measure the strike and dip of fractures and foliation exposed in the current pit to determine if <br />any adverse orientations exist. A person experienced in measuring fracture orientations must be <br />employed to conduct the mapping. Typically the results of the measurements aze depicted on a <br />Schnudt equal-azea net to evaluate the dominant fracture orientations. <br /> <br />DIVISION O <br />MINERAL. <br />GEOLOG' <br />RECLn MATIOt <br />MIN IN G•SAFET` <br />The strength of the rock exposed in the pit wall must be evaluated. The attached table 1 provides a <br />useful rock classification system. Any azeas of rock that fall below the R2 strength classification <br />aze not suitable for reclamation as a benched or terraced highwall, and should be reclaimed like an <br />