Laserfiche WebLink
-25- <br />The depletion of ground water from aquifers may impact the discharge of <br />over and underlying aquifers by drying up springs and seeps. The <br />applicant has identified only two springs, SP-1 and SP-2 in the permit <br />and adjacent areas. The drying up of these springs will slightly reduce <br />surface flow during high flow periods and also improve water quality, <br />since these springs are intermittent and have poor water qualities. The <br />net impact of drying up these springs will be minimal and even beneficial <br />since the water quality of these springs is poor. <br />The depletion of bedrock ground water in the mine area will not impact <br />any wells within the permit and hydrologically adjacent areas. Water <br />depleted from ground water aquifers will be replenished upon closure of <br />the mine. The depletion will continue until the mine working fill and an <br />equilibrium is established between the mine workings and the overlying <br />and underlying strata. <br />All underground mines that induce subsidence have the potential to <br />increase mine inflows particularly if the subsidence occures within a <br />significant source of water (ex. stream, pond, alluvial aquifer). However <br />coal mine subsidence does not seem to be a source of significant inflows <br />into the North Thompson Creek Mines. Areas which have undergone longwall <br />and pillar extraction (e.g., areas of controlled subsidence) do not <br />contribute significant inflows. This can be attributed to the fact that <br />these mine areas are not under perennial stream valleys, but under the <br />steep hillslopes. Limited extraction is planned under Middle and North <br />Thompson Creeks in the future. This limited extraction will minimize the <br />impacts of subsidence on the hydrologic balance of the overlying stream <br />and aquifers. Future monitoring of mine inflows will enable the <br />quantification of the effects of subsidence on the quantity of ground and <br />surface waters. <br />The applicant has submitted analyses of the coals, roof, and floor <br />strata. The analyses of the roof and floor materials performed by the <br />Soils Laboratory of Colorado State University (Appendix 3-I) indicate <br />that these units contain insufficient carbonate minerals to buffer the <br />iron sulfide (e.g., pyrite) contained in these strata. These analyses <br />indicate that these strata are acid-forning and potentially toxic. <br />The inactive North Thompson Creek No. 2 Mine contains both acid and toxic <br />mine waters (see laboratory analysis of Portal No. 2 Mine, dated June 22, <br />1982). This analysis shows that mine water in the No. 2 Mine exceeds <br />receiving stream standards for the following ions: aluminum, cadmium, <br />chloride, copper, iron, manganese, ammonia, sulfate, zinc, and total <br />dissolved solids. Afield measurement of pH by MLRD staff obtained a pH <br />value of 2.5 for the No. 2 Mine water. It must be noted that this mine <br />is abandoned and "pre-law"; it is not proposed to be reopened not <br />pernitted under this proposed decision. <br />During mining, water which collects in the mine has limited exposure to <br />the affected strata prior to discharge to the surface. Thus, there is <br />little degradation of water quality. However, upon completion of mining, <br />there is a potential for the formation of acidic and toxic mine waters. <br />This degradation of water quality would result from the prolonged <br />exposure of water to fractured roof strata and to the exposed coal and <br />floor strata once the mine pumps are shut off. <br />