Laserfiche WebLink
.~ ; _. <br />a claim. <br />Item #8 Amount - $5,000.00 <br />The contract calls for staking where it is deemed necessary. I <br />have no evidence that this was deemed necessary until after the <br />fact. <br />Item #9 Amount - $2,100.00 <br />It is conceivable that the distance could have an impact on the <br />method of construction, but I have no evidence of that here. I <br />don't even know what the new agreed upon spacing is. <br />Item #10 Amount - $3,500.00 <br />This is part of the project and the contractor should have built an <br />equipment allowance into his bid. There is not justification for <br />this extra. <br />Item #11 Amount - $5,500.00 <br />See Item #5. The cost of these materials should have been <br />considered when the deduct was determined to eliminate the drop <br />structures. <br />Item #12 Amount - $40,000 <br />The information provided is totally insufficient to make any kind <br />of judgement on this. It is my understanding that some level of <br />topsoil was considered in the base bid. <br />Item #13 Amount - $4,480 <br />Because the unsatisfactory completion of the rock in the Chen's <br />Hill ditch, monies have to be retained to cover that cost. There <br />is no justification on collecting interest on retainage being held <br />to satisfy a claim. <br />Item #14 Amount - $150.00 <br />The State owes the contractor for the work ordered. <br />STATE CLAIMS <br />#1 <br />