Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Peregrines, page 3 <br />~J <br />L) tho same year usually i.nvulves a shifC in nest n.i te. Cliffs Icnd to rep ro.~ent <br />the eyuivalenC of escape cover. Successful eyries may have Co be nt leas[ onc- <br />half mile from [he ncarc~t hwnan habitation, unless the cliff is parCicularly <br />high and precipitous: (Ilickoy and Anderson, 1969). Several iuvestigaCUrs have <br />observed tlvtt what seems to be suitable nes Ci.ng habitat i.s noC presently occu- <br />pied, and in :ome cases ai~penrs never to have been used. Avni.l ab lr data :jllgl; L`SC <br />[ha[ only certain cliffs rniC of all. ChO:ii: HV a11aI)1C :IrC aCCCp t:161C', alld Lha C. <br />these cliffs arc used year afCCr year (Whiff and Cadu, 1971). <br />Uetcrioracion of Che habitat is not the major problem for the peregrine <br />falcon. liven stags with dense human populations like California and Colorado <br />have more than enough suitabl.c nesting sites Cor Chu present populations. 'fhc <br />major problem stems co be that. relatively few pairs arc breeding. Increasing <br />development of Che West, resulting i.n loss of habitat, is having nn effect on <br />western populations. YroCectinn of existing nest .iCCS and hrccd~ing pairs is <br />thus very impor[anC. ~(Snuw, 1972). <br />Peregrines, fur the most part, Lave been tolerant of human intrusion into <br />nesting territories. 'They have even nesCed successfully on skyscrapecs in large <br />cities. Researchers disagree on Che impact of visits to the eyrie. Some feel <br />Chat eyries should not be visited at all, while others think that there are no <br />harmful efCcr[s caused~by human ncCi.viti.es (Snow, 1972). Nelson (1970) believes <br />Chat there is a shorC period prior to and during egg laying when desertion of a <br />nest ledge can be caused even by careful visits by man. Cade, f:ndet'sun, White, <br />and Craig have also questioned Che possible effects of. eyrie visitations on <br />peregrine behavior (Scow, 1972). The critical period when desertion may occur <br />is probably as variable as Che behav.iur of individual birds. Five pairs may <br />tolerate activiti:s by man that Che sixth pair WL11 not; yeC the sir.Cli is the <br />only pair which breeds succes:ful.Ly; therefore disturbance oC the si>:eh pair is <br />very serious to population survival (Snow, 1972). <br />(in Alaska] oil exp]oraCion teams have unintenCionally caused [he deaths of <br />peregrine nesClings by Irig;htening them from their nests tahile Lalcing gcolof;ical <br />samples from Ulc nesting; cliff. Ncs U fags incapable of flight were killed by <br />the fall. In some instances adulCS deserted Clteir eyries. (Craig, 1972). <br />A definite possibility for habitat management is the restriction of acti- <br />vities around known e}'cics during the breeding season, ns there arc cerCa~in <br />times of Che year when tLc'sr_ sites arr_ vulnerable [o hwnan disturbance and other <br />tl.mes when they arc nut (Snow, 1972). <br />References: <br />Cadc, T. J. 19G0. L:colug;y of f.hc peregrine and gyrfalcon populations in Alaska. <br />Univ. Cal. Publ. 'tool., 63:151-2G7. <br />CraiL, G. ]972. Pcrson,)1 canmunicaCion to C. Snow. <br />tindorson, J. II. 1969. Population trends nmoug peregrine falcons in the Rocky <br />AtuunCain region. in Peregrine Falcon Popu].aCions. J. .1. llickcy (ed.), Univ. <br />Wiscunsi.n Yress, hlilwaulutu. _ <br />f:ndcrson, .1. 11. 1972. I'orsun,tl conummication Lo C. Snow. <br />