Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ISSUES THAT THE DIVISION BELIEVES ARE NOT WITHIN THE NRISDICTION OF THE DIVISION OR <br />THE BOARD <br />I0. "No water shall be discharged to the Western Mutual Ditch; " <br />11. "In the event the Western Mutual Ditch or its shareholders are injured by Applicant's dewatering activities, <br />Applicant shall be required to cease all dewatering activity until such injury is remedied and Applicant <br />demonstrates that no such injury will occur in the future. /n addition, Applican[ shall be required to compensate <br />Western Munta! Ditch Company jor damages sustained as a result ojany injury caused by Applicant's activities. " <br />12. "No use ojDitch access road without Western's express permission. " <br />Issues from the Pre-Hearing Statement of Michael Ptasnik <br />ISSUES WITHIN THE NRISDICTION OF THE DIVISION AND THE BOARD <br />"The Applicant must demonstrate that the proposed de-watering activities will not injure neighboring alluvial wells. <br />At a minimum, the jollowing conditions should be imposed on the Applicant: " <br />1. '7Jo dry mining ojany kind (with limited exception-see below) shall be permitted without re-application to the <br />Mined Land Reclamation Board. Applicant shall notify all parties to the present Application proceeding by mail <br />ojany re-application seeking increased de-watering activities. " <br />Division response: If an operator wishes to change arty aspect of the reclamation permit, the permit must be modified <br />to allow for this change. That modification may take the Corm of a technical revision (a change in the permit which does <br />not have more than a minor etTect upon the approved Reclamation Plan) or amendment (a change in the permit or an <br />application which increases the acreage of the affected land, or which has a significant effect upon the approved <br />Reclamation Plan). In this case, the Division would prefer not to condition the permit to require the operator to notify <br />all parties, however, the Board has the option to do so. <br />"De-watering activity shall be limited to the creation oja 'starter pit' jor the assembly ofthe wet mining dredge, <br />and the jollowing restrictions shall apply: <br />Z. "No more than 1 acre on the entire property that is the subject ojthe applicaion shall be de-watered at any one <br />time. " <br />Division Response: U a letter dated March 30, 2001, the Applicant committed to limit the area of dewatering to one <br />(1) acre or less in each lake area as recommended in the March 23, 2001 Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers <br />Report submitted to the Division. Any deviation Jiom this plan will need to be submitted and approved by the Division. <br />3. "Any starter pit shall be constructed as jar from any neighboring wells as possible, as close [toJ the South Platte <br />River as possible, and in areas ojreduced aquifer transmissivity. " <br />Division Response: [n a letter dated Apri14, 2001, the Applicant committed to following the recommendations in the <br />Leonard Rice Report dated March 23, 2001. Specifically, mining in each lake area will be done as far from off site <br />wells as possible and as close to the river as practical for the lake azea development. <br />4. "De-watering activities shall occur only between the months ojOctober and March, inclusive. " <br />Division Response: !n a letter dated Apri14, 2001, the Applicant committed to mining in each dewatering area to begin <br />early in the summer so that aquifer dewatering is complete prior to the next irrigation season. This commitment was <br />recommended in the March 23, 2001 Leonard Rice Report to further minimize impacts to the other groundwater users. <br />Based on the groundwater analysis report prepazed by Leonard Rice, the Division found this additional commitment <br />to be adequate to further protect the surrounding well owners. Any further agreements between the Applicant and <br />