My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44645
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44645
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:11:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000158
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/13/2001
Doc Name
PLATTE SAND & GRAVEL LLC FN M-2000-158 S & H MINE NEW 112 MINING & RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION AD
From
DMG
To
PLATTE SAND & GRAVEL LLC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
n <br /> <br />Addendum and Supplement to the Addendum to the <br />Rationale for Recommendation for Approval, Over Objections; Regular 112 <br />Construction Materials New Application, <br />Platte Sand & Gravel, LLC <br />S & H Mine, File No. M-2000-158 <br />June 13, 2001 <br />Addendum <br />On May 24, 2001, Lind, Lawrence & Ottenhoff LLP a firm representing Western Mutual Ditch Company ("Westem <br />Mutual' petitioned the Mined Land Reclamation Board ("MLRB'~ under Rule 2.7.2 to admit Westem Mutual as a "Party" <br />to the Platte Sand & Gravel, LLC; S & H Mine File No. M-2000-158 proceedings. The MLRB accepted the petition to <br />allow Western Mutual as a Party to this matter but limited party status to the hydrologic issues. <br />This document is an addendum to the "Rationale for Recommendation for Approval Over Objections for the Platte Sand <br />& Gravel, LLC, S & H Mine, File No. M-2000-158" document dated April 6, 2001. The following are issues raised by <br />Western Mutual, in its May I8, 200i letter, and the Division's rationale for the approval recommendation over these <br />concerns and objections to the S & H Mine application, File No. M-2000-158. <br />ISSUES WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE DIVISION AND THE BOARD <br />':4t the hearing, Western will propose the following !imitations on the Applicant" (Lind, Lawrence & OaenhoJjLLP, <br />May !8, 2001) <br />1. "Area ojdewatering less than !acre on the entire property at any given time; " <br />Division Response: In a letter dated March 30, 2001, the Applicant committed to limit the area of dewatering to one <br />(1) acre or less in each lake area as recommended in the March 23, 2001 Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers <br />Report submitted to the Division. Airy deviation from this plan will need to be submitted and approved by the Division. <br />2. "Dewatering to occur as close ro the South Platte River and as jar from the Ditch as possible; " <br />Division Response: In a letter dated April 4, 2001, the Applicant committed to following the recommendations in the <br />Leonard Rice Report dated March 23, 2001. Specifically, mining in each lake area will be done as faz from off site <br />wells as possible and as close to the river as practical for the lake azea development. <br />3. "Mining depth during dewatering limited to !5 feet below the static water level; " <br />Division Response: In a letter dated March 30, 2001, the Applicant committed to the limit the depth of mining to IS <br />feet below the static water level or less during set up of the dredge, to reduce the impacts to the surrounding wells. <br />4. "No dewatering between March l5 and October l6 ojany given year withart Western's express permission; " <br />Division Response: In a letter dated April 4, 2001, the Applicant committed to mining in each dewatering area to begin <br />early in the summer so that aquifer dewatering is complete prior to the next imgation season. This commitment was <br />recommended in the March 23, 2001 Leonard Rice Report to further minimize impacts to the other groundwater users. <br />Based on the groundwater analysis report prepared by Leonard Rice, the Division found this additional commitment <br />to be adequate to further protect the surrounding well owners. Any further agreements between the Applicant and <br />Western Mutual Ditch Company are private matters and not within the jurisdiction of the Division or the MLRB. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.