My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44637
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44637
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:11:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/2/2005
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for SL2
From
Phase I for Lone Pine Gulch Ventilation Facility Area
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Notice <br />MCC published notice of the bond release application in the Delta County Independent once weekly <br />for four consecutive weeks, beginning on August 18, 2004. MCC also notified the landowners <br />within and adjacent to the mine permit area, and other interested parties of the application for bond <br />release, as required by Section 3.03.2(1). <br />Bond Release Inspection <br />The Division conducted a bond release inspection on October 7, 2004. The site inspection was <br />conducted in accordance with Section 3.03.2(2). Jim Burnell and Sandy Brown represented the <br />Division. Henry Bazbe represented MCC. Dennie Wilson, manager of the Lazy H Ranch, <br />represented a landowner in the bond release azea, DLH Trust - Lazy H Ranch. Mitch Rollings <br />represented the Office of Surface Mining. The Division notified the U.S. Forest Service of the <br />inspection, but' they did not attend. Inspection reports prepazed by the Division and the Office of <br />Surface Mining aze on file at the Denver office of the Division of Minerals and Geology. <br />Chronoloay of Division's Review of Bond Release Application <br />The Division reviewed technical aspects of MCC's bond release submittal in order to determine if <br />the requested bond release is warranted. The review included an evaluation of hydrologic impacts. <br />The Division requested additional information from MCC regazding slope stability, erosion control, <br />and certification of engineering drawings (letter dated October 25, 2004). MCC resolved these <br />issues in materials submitted on July 21, 2005 in the application for Minor Revision 312. <br />The Division received no written objections, or requests for an informal conference regarding the <br />bond release application. <br />Upon request from the Division, the operator revised the dollaz amount of the bond release request <br />in a phone call on October 13, 2005 from the original amount of $45,937 to $122,629. This change <br />was necessary to correct an inadvertent transposition of request amounts between SL-02 and SL-01. <br />III. CRITERIA FOR BOND RELEASE <br />The bond release application is for phase I release. Phase I release is allowed by Section 3.03.1(2)(a) <br />which states, "Up to sixty percent of the applicable bond amount shall be released when the <br />permittee successfully completes backfilling, regrading, and drainage control in accordance with the <br />approved reclamation plan." <br />The reclamation plan for the bond release azea is set forth in Section 2.05.4 ofthe permit application. <br />The plan calls for removal of structures, backfilling and sealing of the two portals, regrading of <br />disturbed areas, topsoil replacement, and revegetation of disturbed areas with an approved seed mix. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.