My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44590
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44590
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:19 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:09:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/16/2007
Doc Name
2006 Revegetation Evaluation
From
J.E. Stover & Associates Inc
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Vegetation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 1 Snowcap -Vegetation Cover - 2006 <br />Revegetation Success Comparisons <br /> Plant Cover Diversity <br /> (% average cover) (°h Relatlve Cover) <br /> Number of <br /> All Lifeforms Perennial Total Perennial Total Perennial Total Perennial (Planted) <br /> (90% of Ref. Lifefomts Cool-Season Warm-Season Forbs @ Species wiM <br /> (90%of Ref. Grass Grass Subshrubs <br /> Area Value) >70Mo Rel. Cove <br /> Area Value) Standard (>0.5%) Standard (>2.0%) StandaM (>0.5%) <br /> Standard (O) <br />Greasewood Reference Area Comparison <br />lIR-Conveyor Pass Pass Pau Fail Fail Pass <br /> (84.9 vs. 5].9) (33.6 vs. 18.2) (4.01) (O.OO) (0.00) (0) <br />North Decline Mine Fail Fail Pass Fail Pass Pass <br />oewatedn 5 em (13.fi vs. 5L4) (lo.7 v:. 1s.2) (zs.7a) (o.oo) (vss) (9) <br />Roadside North Portal Pass Pass Fail Fail Pass Pass <br />Facilities (60.6 vs. 5].I) (29.9 vs. 18.2) (0.17) (0.00) (16.5) (0) <br />Cameo Borrow Area Fail Pass Fail Fail Pass Pass <br />No.2 (99.2 n. s7.a) (zz.l vs. 18.2) (04s) (O.oo) (19.6a) (o) <br />Cameo Topsoil Piles Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Pass <br /> (59.0 vs. 5].4) (1].5 vs. 18.2) (0.3J) (0.00) (0.00) (0) <br />Cameo Borrow Area Fail Fail Pass Fail Pass Pass <br />No.l (52.4 vs. 5].9) (1].2 vs. 19.2) (OJ6) (OJ6) (6.99) (0) <br />hadswle Reference Area Comparison <br />Substation B Fafl Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass <br /> (39.9 v5.48.2) (20.]v5. fi.]) (11.28) (9.01) (23.56) (O) <br />2 West Portal Area - Fail Pass Pau Pass Pass Pass <br />Ea5[ (21.6 vb. 48.2) (/2.3 vs. 6.]) (9.83) (5.09) (3J0) (O) <br />2 West Portal Area - Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass <br />West (33.8 v5. 48.2) (22.7 vs. 6.7) (23.37) (3.25) (0.89) (0) <br />Roadside Refuse Feil Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass <br />Borrow area (33.6 wz, 4s.z) O.]vs. 6.7) (S.M) (0.60) (]zs) (a7 <br />Roadside RDA Pass Pass Pass Fail Pa55 Pass <br /> (5].6 vs. 98.2) (29.5 vs. 6.]) (0.52) (0.00) (39.93) (O) <br />Roadside South Porta Fail Faii Fah Fail Pass Pass <br />Upper Diversion Ditch (42.6 vs. 48.2) (5.3 vs. 6.7) (0.00) (0.00) (9.86) (0) <br />Cameo RDA No.l Fail Pass Pass Fall Fail Pass <br />20025eedin (39.8 vs. 98.2) (21.2 vs. 6.]) (10.8) (0.75) (0.00) (0) <br />Cameo RDA No.2 Fail Pass Fail Fail Pass Pass <br />20025eedin (39.1 vs. 48.2) (15.9 vs. 6.]) (Q26) (0.00) (2.05) (0) <br />South Fan -East Fail Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass <br /> (38.6 v5.48.2) (10.1 vs. fi.]) (9.q (0.00) (6.56) (0) <br />South Fan -West Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass <br /> (27.2 vs. 98.2) (20.0 vs. 6.]) (6.25) (3.3q (6.99) (0) <br />Note: Production and Woody Plant Density were not sampled in these areas in 2006 <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 9 SNOWCAP COAL COMPANY <br />Revegetation Evaluation - 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.