My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44519
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44519
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:17 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:07:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981023
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/9/2005
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for SL5
From
Final Phase III
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 8 -Species diversity: <br />Barren Ridge/Revision 1 Area versus Technical Standards <br /> Sampling Results <br /> <br /> 2003 2004 <br />Technical Standards: <br /> 4 species: 4 species: <br />Minimum 2cool-season Achnatherum Achnatherum <br />perennial grasses, each hymenoides, hymenoides, <br />comprising between 3% Nassella viridula, Nassella viridula, <br />and 60°~ relative cover Pascopyrum smithii, Pascopyrum smithii, <br /> Thinopyrum Thinopyrum <br /> intermedium intermedium <br />Minimum 1 warm- <br />season perennial grass, 1 specie: 1 specie: <br />comprising between 3% Chondrosum gracile Chondrosum gracile <br />and 60% relative cover <br />Minimum of either 1 <br />perennial forb or 1 1 specie: Serphidium 1 specie: Serphidium <br />shrub, comprising tridentatum tridentatum <br />between 3% and 60% <br />relative cover <br />Completion of Final Inspection Required by Section 3.03.2(21 <br />As previously explained, the Division conducted a bond release inspection on September 28, 2004. <br />The inspection was conducted in accordance with Section 3.03.2(2). The inspection focused on <br />completion of reclamation work, success of the work, erosional and slope stability of the reclaimed <br />lands, and implementation of the postmining land use. As explained in the Division's inspection <br />report, field observations supported a finding to approve the bond release application, pending <br />resolution of gully erosion on the site (see discussion of erosional stability, below). <br />Completion of Evaluation Required by Section 3.03.2(21 <br />The Division has conducted an evaluation of the reclamation work, in accordance with Section <br />3.03.2(2). This evaluafion considered, among other things: the results of inspections and monitoring, <br />the need for further reclamation work, whether pollution of surface or subsurface water is occurring, <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.