My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44417
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:12 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:00:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/9/2000
Doc Name
FAX COVER 1333.0
From
W W HEELER AND ASSOCIATES INC
To
CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM CO HENDERSON MILL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11/09/00 T1IU 11:12 FA3' <br />W W WHEELER <br /> <br />Probable Maximum Snow Moisture Content <br />The Probable Maximum snow moisture conten~ was calculated in the <br />following manner: <br />1. The maximum February 1st moisture content for the period of <br />record was determined. This represents the greate:;t histor- <br />ical accumulation during December and January, <br />2. The maximum recorded gain in moisture content for the month <br />of February was determined. The same was done for the months <br />of March and Apri~ regardless of the year in which the gain <br />was recorded. <br />3. The Probable Maximum snowpack was determined assuming that <br />all of the maximums derived for No. 1 and No. 2 would occur <br />in the same year, <br />Accordingly, the snow moisture content for the PM snowpack was <br />estimated to be 28,0 inches. <br />Snowmelt Runoff <br />In order to determine the relation between snowpack moisture <br />content and the resulting runoff, correlations were made usin0 the <br />snow course data and the recorded flows (1968-1971) at former stream <br />gage 101 which was located on the East Branch of Ute Creek ju:;t down- <br />stream of what is now Tailing Dam No. 2, The results were then com- <br />pared, using frequency analysis, to the recorded runoff for other <br />streams in the upper Williams fork basin. The comparative snnwmalt <br />runoff is shown in Table 1. <br />1t can be observed from Table 1 that the runoff per square mile <br />increases with increasing basin elevation and that the relative values <br />seem reasonable. Therefore, since the mean basin elevation fcrr all of <br />the Henderson sub-has~ns is very nee-'.~~ the same as for gage 101, the <br />estimated snowmelt (acre-feet per square mile) at gage 101 was adopted <br />for use throughout the Henderson Project area. The snowmelt runoff is <br />tabulated in Table 2. <br />Peak Rates of Flow <br />The peak rates of flow shown in Table 2 were derived by analyzing <br />-5- <br />029751 <br />W.W. WHEELER <br />009 <br />RECEIVED TIME NOV. 3. 51~11AM PRINT TIME NOV. 9. l1:iBAM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.