My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44289
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44289
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:03 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:57:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/23/1990
Doc Name
REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY RESPONSES PR1
From
MLRD
To
JEFF CLAPTON
Permit Index Doc Type
SOILS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~~~ I~~I~~I~~II~~ I~~ <br />STATE OF COLvtcriivv <br />MIMED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION ~oF ~0~4 <br />Department of Natural Resources a , ~~r <br />-~~r 1$ <br />:; <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 ~ /,t ~~ ~ ,% <br />Denver, CO 60203 ~ ~ <br />303 666 3567 •' ya96 ~ <br />FA X: 303 632-8106 <br />Roy Romer, <br />Governor <br />DATE: February 23, 1990 FretlR Banta. <br />Division D~recror <br />T0: Jeff Clayton <br />~f <br />FROM: Carl Mount~y,~. ~ / b <br />RE: Review of Preliminary Adequacy Responses, PR-Ol, <br />P&M Coal Company's Edna Mine, C-80-001 <br />I have reviewed the soils and stream buffer zone adequacy responses that P&M <br />Coal Company submitted on February 16, 1990. I have found that their answers <br />to questions 4, 6, 7, and 13 of the ML RD Preliminary Adequacy Review letter of <br />January 20, 1990 are now adequate. Questions 4, 6, and 7 related to topsoil <br />and question 13 to stream buffer zones. <br />There are still problems with the delineations on Exhibit 4.3-1 "Topsoil <br />Removal Years Related to Mining Years." Further, I can find nothing in the <br />text or exhibits that clearly states that the ground underneath the south <br />Moffat area topsoil stockpile will be tops oiled. Therefore, the following <br />concerns apply to P&M's adequacy responses: <br />Text <br />Please state in the appropriate text location what topsoil thickness will <br />be used for reclamation of the area beneath the footprint of the Moffat <br />Area southern topsoil stockpile. <br />Exhibit 4.3-1 <br />~". Should the "End of Topsoil Replacement - Year 19 (EOTR-YR 19 )" line <br />extend east to the topsoil removal boundary line? If so, please change <br />i t. <br />y2~ The area to the north of the "EOTR-YR 19" line needs to be labeled to <br />indicate when it will be topsoiled. <br />~,3~ Will all of the northern topsoil stockpile be reclaimed in year 20 or <br />will part of it be reclaimed in years 12 and 13 as the exhibit now <br />depicts? Please label this area as appropriate. <br />4. The topsoil removal variance areas will be graded to drain towards Trout <br />Creek. Therefore, the Division assumes that these regraded areas will be <br />reclaimed concurrent with the areas adjacent and to the west. Please <br />extend the EOTR-lines appropriately so that. this is clear. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.