Laserfiche WebLink
area, divert water from Fish, Middle, and Trout Creeks to facilitate farming <br />of forage crops such as grass, hay and alfalfa. The ditches are utilized <br />primarily during the growing season. <br />Water rights records from the State Engineer's Office were reviewed to <br />determine current surface water usage in the area. These records (1984) <br />indicate that the primary use for water from Fish Creek outside of any <br />permitted mine area is for irrigation. There are several domestic water users <br />along the Fish Creek drainage, but these are all upstream from the Foidel <br />Creek Mine. Foidel Creek water is used solely for irrigation purposes at <br />Eckman Park. There are no surface water rights along the reach of Middle <br />Creek downstream from its confluence with Foidel Creek. Water use along Trout <br />Creek is also principally agricultural. <br />Probable Hydrologic Consequences of the Foidel Creek Mine <br />A. Ground Water <br />The proposed Foidel Creek Mine may impact the quantity and quality of ground <br />water during and after mining. Possible ground water impacts are: <br />1) Depletion of ground water from rock and alluvial aquifers; <br />2) Depletion of spring flows; <br />3) Depletion of water well yields; <br />4) Degradation of water quality in bedrock and alluvial aquifers; <br />5) Degradation of water quality through surface discharges of aquifers <br />(springs and base flow to streams), and <br />6) Degradation of surface water quality through pumpage of lower quality <br />water from the mine. <br />These potential impacts are discussed by aquifer in the following paragraphs. <br />Aquifers not discussed will not be impacted by the proposed Foidel Creek <br />mine. <br />During mining, the applicant has predicted a dewatering of the Wadge <br />coal-overburden aquifer and the dewatering of three fault zones due to <br />drawdowns of ground water into the mine workings. The applicant used two <br />mathematical models to obtain a projected combined mine inflow rate and <br />drawdown cone with the Wadge coal-overburden aquifer. These two models were <br />the GROUND WATER model, a finite difference, two dimensional, digital model, <br />and a Line-Sink model. The GROUND WATER model was developed by Colorado State <br />University to predict steady-state dewatering of an aquifer, while the <br />Line-Sink model presented in McWhorter and Sunada (1977) was used to predict <br />the additional inflows resulting from the dewatering of two fault zones. The <br />resulting discharge rates and extent of the drawdowns from the two models were <br />added together to obtain a total maximum predicted mine inflow of 310 gallons <br />-40- <br />