Laserfiche WebLink
JAN-12-95 TNU 19:02 <br />November 8, 199d <br />Page 3 <br />P. 04 <br />mine has submittefl altered maps to the Division at different <br />times. The mine continues to deny any responsibility for <br />the subsidence we are seeing in our home. WE DO KNOW that <br />these cracks were NOT PRESENT before mining took place under <br />our property. WE DO KNOW that the only possible reason for <br />this to be happening is subsidence, yet the responsible <br />party continues to ignore the•law and their responsibilities <br />to the land owners and residents of the valley. The law <br />requiring bonds before mining was ignored. <br />~L'Lle 1114 1'CL{Il YCL'LIL I. 1lCV1tM 1/L tl,aL Ct1 uY JObC(l11 ULL114bn U11 <br />December,. 1992, is enclosed for your reference. Please <br />explain why Stipulation 28 which remains in effect (enclosed <br />is a copy of the January 21, 1994 finding) is not enforced? <br />Does Stipulntion 28 only come into effect after the removal <br />of a certain amount of coal, and if so how much coal must <br />the mine report removing before they must implement a <br />monitoring report? It is to be noted that the mine assured <br />us.in writing .(a copy of the letter is enclosed) that this <br />would be carefully monitored. This was not done. <br />Enclosed is a copy of the November 19, 1990, letter <br />from Wyoming Fuel. to Berhan Keffelew. Explain why this <br />~. letter and map make no mention of, our water well? I have <br />been advised that the water well do@s appear, but it doesn~t <br />appear to be within our property boundary. If that is the <br />excuse, then how reliable are any maps that the mine submits <br />for permits? Please advise which symbol designates a water <br />well and how my property boundaries are designated. <br />Make note that we did not <br /> <br />mine or San Isabel to trespass <br />this exhaust fan and that this <br />the mining on the North side o1 <br />not used under our property but <br />sign ANY AGREEMENT with the <br />on our property to install <br />fan was installed to assist <br />Highway 12. This shaft is <br />for the adjacent property. <br />I was so concerned about the prospective. noise to be <br />emitted from this shaft; representatives from the mine took <br />me and my husband. to another shaft so I could hear how a <br />sound suppression device worked. I received the assurance <br />that a sound suppression system would be placed on the <br />exhaust shaft on my property. This is a fact that the <br />mine now denies and no such device has been installed. <br />All of these issues are addressed in our original <br />complaint. <br />We have in our file a letter from Robert Hagen, <br />Director of the Albuquerque Field Office, dated February 4, <br />1994, and enclosures, stating that the mine was not cited <br />