Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Lenders' real estate collateral <br />In re Guterl Special Steel Co <br />11 U.S.C. 5 506(c).6 See, <br />198 B.R. 128, 136 <br />(Bankr.W.D.Pa.1996) (EPA could collect cleanup costs from the <br />secured lender and from funds previously disbursed by the <br />estate); In re Environmental Waste Control, Inc., 125 B.R. <br />546, 550, 552 (N.D.Ind.1991); In re Nlowbray Enqineerinq Co., <br />67 B.R. 34, 35 (Bankr.M.D.A1a.1986) (EPA is entitled under <br />§ 506(c) to recover costs of cleaning up contaminated property <br />prior to satisfying any secured claims against the property); <br />In re Better Brite Plating, Inc., 105 B.R. 912, 918 <br />(Bankr.E.D.Wis.1989) (giving EPA and Wisconsin Department of <br />Natural Resources priority over secured creditors in proceeds <br />of sale of property). <br />POINT III <br />The Lenders Are Not Entitled to Relief From Stay, Because <br />the Proceeds of the Sale of the Machinery and Equipment Are <br />Necessary to an Effective Reorganization of the Debtor Quaker <br />Coal Company <br />The proceeds of the Machinery and Equipment are necessary <br />for an effective reorganization of the Debtor Quaker Coal <br />Company, the parent of the Debtor Powderhorn. Therefore, the <br />6"The trustee may recover from property securing an allowed secured claim the <br />reasonable, necessary costs and expenses of preserving, or disposing of, such <br />property to the extent of any benefit to the holder of such claim." <br />23 <br />