My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL43723
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL43723
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:12:33 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:36:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
US BANKRUPTCY COURT DMG OBJECTION TO THE LENDERS MOTION FOR ADEQUATE PROTECTION AND FOR RELIEF
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
or firm may not maintain a nuisance, pollute the waters of the <br />State or refuse to remove the source of such conditions."); <br />Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of <br />Environmental Protection, 474 U.S. 499, 505 (1966) (28 U.S.C. <br />§ 959 (b) supports the conclusion that "Congress did not intend <br />for the Bankruptcy Code to preempt all state laws that <br />otherwise constrain the exercise of a trustee's powers."). <br />The Debtor Powderhorn is obligated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. <br />§ 959(b) to comply with its reclamation and environmental <br />remediation obligations under the Colorado Coal Act, even <br />though it is no longer mining coal in Colorado and is in a <br />liquidating mode. See, In re Wall Tube & Metal Products, Co., <br />631 F.2d 118, 122 (6"' Cir. 1987) (28 U.S.C. § 959(b) applies <br />to Chapter 7 liquidating trustees)°; In re Stevens, 68 B.R. <br />774 (D.Me.1987) (28 U.S.C. § 959 (b) applies to liquidating <br />trustee) ("The Midlantic message is that `a trustee may not <br />abandon property in contravention of a state statute or <br />regulation that is reasonably designed to protect the public <br />health or safety from identified hazards.' 106 S.Ct. at <br />762.") . <br />aThe court held that the =rustee could not abandon the site under 4 554(a). <br />l6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.