My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL43463
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL43463
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:12:13 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:24:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977210
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/12/1989
From
MARK A HEIFNER
To
JOYCE J NEVILLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:, <br />Pa <br />ge 3 <br />October 10, 1989 <br />Joyce Neville <br />where they are placed in the natural environment, frequently <br />do poorer in the long run than smaller trees. In landscape <br />work the goal is to create an artificially managed <br />environment. This is quite different from mined land <br />reclamation where [he usual goal is to establish a <br />vegetation which can flourish without the addition of any <br />fertilizer, irrigation or other amendments. Thus, in mined <br />land reclamation we try very hard to duplicate the natural <br />processes which would occur if we did nothing. But we try <br />to accelerate the process by helping nature create all those <br />initial conditions. In nature, creating those initial <br />conditions can sometimes take decades. The goals and <br />methods of landscapers and land reclaimers are therefore <br />quite different. We are not averse to using a slightly <br />larger tree size, but even two gallon trees might be too old <br />to adapt well to the much harsher conditions of the wilds of <br />Williams Canyon when compared to the pampering they receive <br />in the nursery. Please keep in mind [hat most native plants <br />are often far less adaptable than they seem. <br />With regard to the hydrologic aspects, we cannot possibly <br />change to a 100 year storm design. Our engineers tell us <br />that to build such a pond would be impossible in the <br />amendment area and the only solution would be to divert the <br />stream channel totally into the quarry. Although such would <br />be possible, resulting in the main quarry pit becoming <br />essentially the sediment basin, diversions carry other <br />repercussions which are more difficult to deal with than <br />some extra sediment. lJater rights could be interfered with <br />and the reduction of flows below the diversion point would <br />very likely alter the character of the vegetation in the <br />drainage all the way to the main stream in Williams Canyon. <br />Therefore, we strongly believe that following the <br />recommendations of our engineers, which are based on the <br />design requirements imposed by the regulatory agency, is the <br />best route to follow. <br />We also wish to point out that very large storms which drop <br />great quantities of water do not often drop their water <br />loads on very small plots of ground. The clouds of super <br />storms often are measured in tens or even hundreds of miles <br />in diameter. Although such storms can have highly variable <br />rainfall amounts within their structure, the likelihood of a <br />super storm dropping a 200 year flood amount on the <br />amendment area and only a 25 year amount in Williams Canyon <br />less than 1000 feet away is essentially zero. If this <br />amendment was 1/2 mile from the canyon we would agree it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.