Laserfiche WebLink
During mining operations and until adequate vegetation is established, runoff and <br />erosion rates within the disturbed area will be higher than pre-mining rates. Seneca <br />Coal Company calculated runoff and erosion sediment yield rates from disturbed <br />areas when designing all sediment ponds. (Tab 13). Sediment leaving the site will <br />be controlled to meet effluent limits placed upon sediment pond discharges in Seneca <br />Coal Company's Colorado Discharge Permit System permit. Baseline flows in <br />Hubberson Gulch exhibit TSS levels from 5 mg/I to 606 mg/I with an average of 100 <br />mg/I. The total suspended solids increase to Hubberson Gulch that can be attributed <br />to mining is expected to be minimal. Once vegetation is successfully reestablished, <br />the erosion rates are expected to return to the pre-muting level of approximately 140 <br />tons/mi'/yr. <br />Sediment ponds will act to control flood flows from the disturbed area. The ponds <br />will regulate flood discharges, minimizing the impact of the floods. The ponds are <br />not expected to significantly reduce the quantity of runoff water available in Dry <br />Creek. The mine area makes up only a small portion of the Dry Creek watershed <br />(0.9%). <br />The major impact of mining will be the development and subsequent discharge to the <br />surface system of spoils aquifer waters. As each successive pit is reclaimed, a spoils <br />aquifer will begin to develop. The water necessary to recharge this aquifer will be <br />derived from precipitation, overland flow, and discharge from the Williams Fork <br />formation overburden and the Wadge coal. <br />The backfilled pits in and of themselves will display unconfined conditions, however <br />the pits will be surrounded on the sides and be underlain by relatively confining <br />units. The underlying material will be even more confining than the sides. <br />As water enters the reclaimed areas it will tend to migrate through the spoils toward <br />the lowest point in the pit. While some of this water may be lost to the walls, the <br />major portion of it will stay in the pit, as the permeability of this material is greater <br />than that of either the walls or the floor. It is projected that the water quality of <br />spoil aquifers at the Seneca II-W Mine site will approximate that at the nearby <br />Seneca II Mine. The Seneca II Mine spoil aquifers exhibit elevated levels of, total <br />dissolved solids, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, and sulfate. Complete <br />water quality analyses of two spoils aquifer wells are published in the Seneca II <br />Mine 1984 Annual Hydrology Report, Appendix B. <br />As the aquifer is developing, the water will be of slightly poorer quality than the <br />above assumptions, but as the more easily leached constituents are lost, the quality <br />should approximate that at Seneca [I Mine. Analysis of spoils water from the Seneca <br />Seneca II-W Findings Document 31 June 15, 2001 <br />Permit Renewal No. 3 <br />