Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Crown Jewel Project <br />June 25, 1992 <br />Page 5 <br />First it will further restrict the effectiveness of the underdrains in <br />vertically draining the slimes. Second, the excess water present in the <br />slimes further away from the primary dam will tend to generate <br />horizontal flows moving towards the perimeter drain on the upstream face <br />of the primary dam. While the flows will not be large they will likely <br />act as a source to recharge water drained from the slimes in areas <br />adjacent to the dam. Accordingly, it is certainly problematical whether <br />the underdrain and perimeter drain will be capable of maintaining the <br />full column of slimes in an unsaturated state. Stated conversely, there <br />is a distinct possibility that the slimes will be stratified with <br />respect to their degree of saturation with those deposited during the <br />winter months being most likely to be at or near saturation. <br />• In addition to the probable vertical stratification in the degree of <br />saturation of the slimes, there is also likely to be a variation <br />horizontally. It would seem that in the controlled depositicn of a <br />given 4 inch Lift of slime, the ability Co facilitate dewateting of the <br />slimes will decrease with increasing distance from the discharge point. <br />Yet, as the embankment section rises the character of the slimes in the <br />back side of the trapezoidal area of Figure 1 will be a key factor in <br />the overall stability of the composite embankment/slime retention <br />barrier. Under ideal conditions the operators will be faced with the <br />formidable task of achieving an unsaturated state within the slimes as <br />much as a 100 to 200 feet from the discharge point. Under ac.verse <br />conditions such as during winter or the spring runoff period, this task <br />will be nearly impossible. <br />• Finally, the design life of the upstream embankment phase of the <br />project will be some 8 to 10 years. It may prove difficult over this <br />time frame to continuously maintain a core of qualified, dedicated <br />personnel managing the deposition of the slime. <br />Design concerns posed by saturated seams within the limits of the composite <br />fill/slimes containment structure - The preceding comments are the basis for <br />the DSS's concerns regarding the ability of the emplacement scheme to <br />uniformly achieve an unsaturated state in the slimes. The principle problem <br />posed by saturated zones within the slimes is the adverse affect it would have <br />on static and dynamic stability of the composite embankment/slime <:ontainment <br />barrier. These concerns are as follows. <br />• Static Stability -The presence of saturated zones pose a concern that pore <br />water pressures may rise as the water phase carries a portion of tf~e weight of <br />the rising, overlying column of slimes, In an extreme case this miry lead to <br />static slope failures. <br />• Dynamic stability - Here the principle concern would be that a lquefaction <br />failure might occur. In this case the soil strength dramatically decreases <br />and the soil is subject to flow failures. <br />For a liquefaction condition to develop it must be shown that saturated seams <br />may be present, as was previously done, But, it must also be shown that the <br />