My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-04-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2000-04-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2021 7:52:35 AM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:20:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/20/2000
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN3
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the White River, which is less than a tenth of a percent of the base flow of the <br /> river. Therefore, the expected change in the recharge capacity of the bedrock <br /> aquifers would not be a significant impact to the alluvial aquifer. <br /> The surface recharge capacity of the alluvial material in Scullion Gulch may be <br /> reduced due to the construction of cuts and fills in the portal areas. This <br /> disturbed area is small relative to the total area of Scullion Gulch and therefore <br /> impacts are expected to be very minor. <br /> Due to the presence of Kenney Reservoir, water withdrawal from the White <br /> River lagoon will not cause measurable drawdown in the alluvium at the well <br /> field site. The quantity of water that will be pumped is less than one percent of <br /> the low flow of the river. <br /> In summary, the impact of mining on the ground water hydrologic system will <br /> be minimal, primarily because of the limited amount of ground water that is <br /> naturally found in the area. <br /> No significant cumulative hydrologic impacts are expected as a result of the <br /> mining activities at Deserado Mine. The Division finds, in accordance with <br /> C.R.S. 34-33-114(2)(c) and Rule 2.07.6(2)(c), that the operation has been <br /> designed to prevent material damage outside the permit area. <br /> III. Topsoil-Rule 4.06 <br /> Soils resource information is found in Volume 3, Section II.I, of the permit application. <br /> Removal, storage and redistribution of topsoil is addressed in Section V, of Vol. 4, <br /> with supplemental information regarding refuse area topsoil and subsoil salvage <br /> volumes presented in Appendix IV A, of Section IV, Vol. 4, of the application. <br /> Topsoil replacement thickness is presented in Table V-4. Replacement thickness will <br /> vary among different facility areas depending on quantity available for salvage. Within <br /> the refuse areas, a minimum of 1 foot of topsoil will be replaced, with a minimum non- <br /> toxic cover (topsoil plus subsoil) thickness of 30 inches. The operator has committed <br /> within Section IV.D.3 of the application, to document topsoil/cover soil material <br /> balance as future refuse area development and reclamation occurs, to ensure that <br /> sufficient quantities of suitable topsoil and subsoil are being salvaged. <br /> Vegetation cover within a significant portion of the acreage to be affected by future <br /> refuse area development is dominated by cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), an aggressive, <br /> weedy annual brome. Cheatgrass infestation has been noted on several of the long-term <br /> topsoil stockpiles in the refuse disposal area, and has also been a problem on RP-1 <br /> permanent reclamation. Cheatgrass is notably less prevalent on subsoil stockpiles <br /> (apparently due to seedbank characteristics, or specific soil factors). In order to <br /> minimize the potential for cheatgrass establishment and dominance on future reclaimed <br /> 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.