Laserfiche WebLink
Effects of Mining on Surface Water <br />Changes in the quantity of water to the prevailing hydrologic balance are <br />primarily due to the location and timing of flows. It is difficult to define <br />any changes due to mining in the Grassy Creek basin because baseline data <br />collected in 1980 include the influence of 12 years of previous mining <br />activity at Seneca II Mine. The Fish Creek drainage, however, does indicate a <br />change in the ground and surface water systems. Mining has increased the <br />amount of ground water available to be discharged into the surface water <br />system, due to discharging spoil aquifers. Cow Camp Creek now exhibits <br />perennial stream flow as a result of mining in this drainage whereas prior to <br />mining the creek emphemeral stream flow conditions existed. <br />Data are insufficient to demonstrate whether short term decreases in stream <br />flow are due to initial filling of ponds and resaturation of backfilled <br />spoils. However, it is apparent that any depletion is extremely short-lived. <br />Variability in annual amounts of precipitation supplied to the watershed makes <br />it difficult to assess short term changes; however, long-term changes in flow <br />are expected to be minimal. <br />Three primary impacts on surface water quality were identified: 1) increased <br />erosion and sediment yield; 2) exceedences of applicable water quality <br />standards; and, 3) increased total dissolved solids loading. <br />Increased Erosion and Sediment Yield <br />During the active mining phase, and until sufficient vegetation can be <br />established in the watershed, sediment yields above pre-mining levels are <br />expected. Annual sediment surveys of the sediment ponds at the Seneca II Mine <br />were initiated in 1985. These surveys will allow actual amounts of sediment <br />deposited to be quantified. With continued monitoring, comparisons to <br />estimated design volumes and erosion rates can be made. Throughout mining, <br />the ponds have ensured compliance with effluent limitations prior to discharge <br />from the mine site, and at no time during the last five years have limitations <br />for total suspended solids been exceeded.. <br />Water Quality Standards <br />A comparison of Grassy Creek water quality at SW-S2-1, upstream of mining <br />activities, to that of SW-S2-2, downstream of mining shows a slight <br />degradation of water quality. SW-S2-2 shows a slight increase in metals <br />concentration, sulfate, and total dissolved solids. These increases can be <br />attributed to mining in the drainage and to the installation of a truck <br />washing facility of NPDES outfall 003, immediately upstream of SW-S2-2. There <br />are no receiving stream standards designated for Grassy Creek but water <br />quality in Grassy Creek generally meets the standards established for Fish <br />Creek. <br />Water quality in Fish Creek shows no significant impact associated with <br />mining. Data collected at site SW-S2-13, downstream from mining activities <br />meets receiving stream standards. <br />Pond outfalls (NPDES outfalls 002, 003, 004, and 005) are monitored according <br />to the requirements of the Seneca II Mine NPDES permit (see section B of this <br />document "Monitoring"). With the exception of the Northwest Impoundment and <br />Pond 004, no parameters have exceeded limitations in the past five years. <br />-2 3- <br />