Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~, <br />Stipulations No. 6, No. 7, No. 8, and No. 9 were added as a result of Permit Renewal <br />No. 1 (RN-O1). <br />Stipulation No. 6 <br />RIMROCK COAL COMPANY, LANDMARK RECLAMATION, INC., OR OTHER <br />PERSONS RESPONSIBLE, SHALL PAY WITHIN 90 DAYS OF NOTIFICATION BY <br />THE DIVISION THAT STIPULATION NO. 7 HAS BEEN TERMINATED, ALL <br />OUTSTANDING CIVIL PENALTIES IDENTIFIED IN THE OFFICE OF SURFACE <br />MINING APPLICANT VIOLATOR SYSTEM. IN LIEU OF PAYMENT, A <br />DEMONSTRATION THAT LANDMARK RECLAMATION, INC. AND RIMROCK COAL <br />COMPANY ARE NOT LINKED TO THE ENTITY IN OKLAHOMA RESPONSIBLE FOR <br />PAYMENT, OR DID NOT HAVE CONTROL OF THE MINES IN OKLAHOMA AT THE <br />TIME THE VIOLATIONS WERE ISSUED, WOULD ALSO BE ADEQUATE. <br />Stipulation No. 6 was attached to the permit as a result of permit renewal (RN-01 ). On <br />January 30, 2001, the Division received a letter from the State of Oklahoma, Division of <br />Mines. This letter explained that a Settlement Agreement had been entered into <br />between Randall and Blake under Chapter 8 of the Bankruptcy Code, Case # 82-00542. <br />On or about June 7, 1993 the Settlement Agreement had been fully performed. All <br />obligations of Randall and Blake of Oklahoma have been satisfied. No penalties remain <br />unpaid. Based on this information, stipulation #6 was terminated on February 12, 2001. <br />Stipulation No. 7: <br />THE PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE OWNERSHIP <br />AND CONTROL RULES CHALLENGE BEFORE THE D.C. CIRCUIT COURT OF <br />APPEALS. ON JANUARY 31, 1997, THE COURT OF APPEALS RENDERED A <br />DECISION UNFAVORABLE TO OSM'S OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL <br />REGULATIONS. ONCE ALL AVENUES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW HAVE BEEN <br />EXHAUSTED, THIS PERMIT WILL BE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE IF IT IS IN <br />COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. <br />This Stipulation was also terminated on February 12, 2001. <br />Stipulation No. 8: <br />WATER QUALITY DATA DEMONSTRATING THE POND WATER MEETS <br />