Laserfiche WebLink
fluid-filled shaft in 40-ft sections (Cox, 1979; Utter and Hawkins, 1978). <br />However, this operation would have maintained a overpressured condition in the <br />shaft throughout the 66-day casing installation period. Under this condition, <br />permeable sections of the Upper and Lower Aquifer would have been subject to <br />invasion of the saline fluid in the shaft due to the overbalanced condition. After <br />the shaft liner was installed, the liner was stage cemented by pumping cement <br />down the annulus. However, Cox (1979) indicates that the cementing operations <br />achieved only limited success, possibly due to the presence of external stiffening <br />rings around the 40-ft sections of the liner and the fact that there were brecciated <br />permeable horizons and dissolved mineral sections behind the shaft liner. Initial <br />test holes drilled though the shaft liner encountered water under pressure in <br />several horizons. Given this scenario, it is likely that the groundwater in the <br />brecciated Lower Aquifer was subject to degradation from the saline drilling fluid <br />and/or saline water from the dissolution zone being forced up the annulus during <br />liner installation. <br />The estimated distance from the shaft to well 29-4 is about 3200 ft. Using the <br />same data as used for nearby well D-1, injected fluid could have traveled <br />approximately 4000 ft northeastward from the USBM shaft in the 22 years since <br />its construction. Thus, the saline water observed in samples from the Lower <br />Aquifer in well 29-4 (Table 1) may have been derived from a 22-year old saline- <br />water plume emanating from the USBM shaft. In addition, drilling-fluid water- <br />quality data collected during the drilling of monitor well 29-4 indicates that <br />groundwater encountered in this well was relatively fresh (less than 2000 µS/cm) <br />and in the range of groundwater quality presented in Dale and Weeks (1978), <br />until the borehole entered the "B-Groove" aquifer. Thus, a contamination plume <br />migrating from the USBM shaft in Horse Draw may have degraded the quality of <br />groundwater in the Lower Aquifer. <br />As was described for the Upper Aquifer, the groundwater quality of the Lower <br />Aquifer beneath and in the vicinity of the Yankee Gulch lease appears to be <br />anomalous relative to the pattem of groundwater quality in the Lower Aquifer in <br />Piceance Creek Basin presented in Robson and Saulnier (1981) and Saulnier <br />(1978). Although the structural geology of the area indicates that there may be <br />fracturing connecting the Upper and Lower Aquifers in the vicinity of the Yankee <br />Gulch lease (Snyder and Terry, 1977), the examples presented above indicate <br />that there is also the likelihood that the somewhat anomalous groundwater <br />quality in the area has been affected by a number of anthropomorphic practices <br />such as inter-aquifer well completions, disposal-well operations, and the sinking <br />of the USBM experimental shaft in Horse Draw. <br />Summary <br />The hydrogeology of the area in the vicinity of the Yankee Gulch lease is both <br />characteristic and anomalous with respect to the accepted pattern of the <br />occurrence of groundwater and groundwater quality in Piceance Creek Basin <br />Sentamber 7. 1999 <br />