Laserfiche WebLink
F • -2- <br />-- <br />The Division recognizes that forb reestablishment iE often harder than <br />grass reestablishment. Forbs formed an important component of the <br />pre-mining vegetative community at the mine site and to exclude them <br />from the post-mining community would be inappropriate. Coors has <br />incorporated three (3) fortis into the approved seed mix, and it is the <br />Division's belief that the reestablishment of one at 3% relative <br />importance is a feasible minimum goal. <br />It should be pointed out that Coors is not restricted to the utilization <br />of the species in the seed mix for the calculaCion of species diversity. <br />The Division and many operators have noted significant contributions by <br />volunteer species on revegetated surfaces. In the. instance that a <br />forb (or grass) which was not in the seed mix has reestablished itself <br />at a level greater than 3% and less than 40% of the relative importance, <br />this species should be included in the species diversity determination. <br />The Division's proposed standard evaluates only on the basis of species <br />present on the reclaimed surface. <br />Additionally, Coors may wish to revise the approved seed mix in order <br />to enhance the probability of attaining the species diversity goal. <br />Revision should be in consultation with the Division, and should be <br />carefully weighed with respect to attaining the further goals of cover <br />and productivity. <br />Due to the dynamic changes in state-of-the-art reclamation technologies <br />and increasing knowledge with respect to these techniques, the Division <br />realizes that standards set at a given time may need to be changed. <br />To this end it is accepCable to the Division that periodic review of the <br />pertinence and acceptability of standards take place. To the agreed <br />standard for species diversity, Coors may wish to add such a.request <br />as this (e.g.): "Coors Energy Company and the Division agree to <br />periodically reevaluate the species diversity standard for the Keenesburg <br />mine and adjust it as warranted by new site-specific data obtained during <br />operations at the mine." <br />At this point I would restate the Division's proposal for a species <br />diversity standard at the Keenesburg mine: <br />The operator shall establish a minimum of seven (7) perennial species, <br />of which fbur (4) are warm season grasses, two (2) are cool season <br />grasses, and one (1) is a forb, to be measured using relative frequency <br />(taken by species). No one component (species)of the above should <br />comprise greater than 40% relative importance, nor less than 3% relative <br />importance. Sandsage is to be reestablished as the woody plant species <br />to the woody plant density standard. This standard is subject to <br />periodic reevaluation and adjustment as warranted by site-specific. <br />data provided by the operator to the Division. <br />In order to reach agreement on this matter as soon as possible, I <br />would appreciate your response by mid July. If you have any questions <br />please feel free to contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />~C Q,ypy s~ <br />Michael S. Savage <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />MS:ep cc: 6. Liddle ~ <br />