GENERAL43153

• Permit No: C1994082
• IBM Index Class Name: General Documents
• Doc Date: 7/5/1995
• Doc Name: PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
• Permit Index Doc Type: FINDINGS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STIPULATION NO. 2
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF POND 11, SENECA COAL COMPANY MUST
SUBMIT ADDITIONAL RECLAMATION PERFORMANCE BOND TO THE
DIVISION. THE BOND AMOUNT MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DIVISION.
STIPULATION NO. 3
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF TOPSOIL PILE F, SENECA COAL COMPANY
MUST SUBMIT ADDITIONAL RECLAMATION PERFORMANCE BOND TO THE
DIVISION. THE BOND AMOUNT MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DIVISION.
STIPULATION NO. 4
PRIOR TO RETENTION OF THE YOAST HAUL ROAD AS PART OF THE POST
MINING LAND USE, A SIGNED CONSENT FORM FROM MANEOTIS SHEEP
COMPANY MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE DIVISION.
STIPULATION NO. 5
WITHIN 180 DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE AND PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF
POND 11, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A TECHNICAL REVISION TO THE
YOAST PERMIT WHICH DEMONSTRATES THAT POND 11 WILL BE LOCATED
AS NEAR AS PRACTICABLE TO THE DISTURBED AREA, AND THAT THE POND
EMBANKMENT HAS A MINIMUM STATIC SAFETY FACTOR OF 1.3.
STIPULATION NO. 6
WITIIIIV SD~CTY DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT
A TECHNICAL REVISION TO THE YOAST PERMIT ADDING A SURFACE WATER
MONITORING STATION TO GRASSY CREEK DOWNSTREAM FROM THE
CONFLUENCE OF GRASSY CREEK AND SCOTCHMANS GULCH. THE REVISION
SHALL ALSO ADDRESS MONITORING FREQUENCY AND PARAMETERS TO BE
MONITORED.
STIPULATION NO. 7
PRIOR TO INITIATING ANY MINE RELATED DISTURBANCE IN THE SAGE
CREEK WATERSHED, THE APPLICANT SHALL COMPLETE EVALUATION OF
THE PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES OF PROPOSED MINING
OPERATIONS IN THE SAGE CREEK WATERSHED. THE EVALUATION SHALL
ADDRESS POSSIBLE MATERIAL DAMAGE IN TERMS OF POTENTIAL
DEGRADATION OF WATER QUALITY OR QUANTITY WHICH MIGHT RESULT
IN IMPAIRMENT OF PRESENT WATER USES WHICH CANNOT BE MITIGATED
OR LONG TERM IMPAIRMENT OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL WATER USES.
Yoast Mine 3 July 6, 1995