My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-10-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
1994-10-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2021 9:19:42 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:11:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/21/1994
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR5
From
Jumbo Mountain Lease
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d) Three hundred feet of any public building, school, church, community <br /> or institutional building, or public park (2.07.6 (2) (d) (iii) (B) ) ; <br /> e) One hundred feet of a cemetery (2.07.6(2) (d) (iii) (C) ) ; <br /> f) The boundaries of any National Forest. More specifically, the <br /> proposed operation (portions of the lease area) is within the <br /> boundaries of Grand Mesa, Dncomprahgre and Gunnison National <br /> Forests. The Secretary has approved this by indicating that West <br /> Elk leases within the forest are suitable for underground coal <br /> mining. Refer to the OSM 1981 Mine Plan Approval, the BLM Report of <br /> Coal Unsuitability Criteria and a letter from the D.S. Forest <br /> Service dated October 3, 1986, concurring with West Elk's Mining <br /> Plan (2 .07 .6(2) (d) (iii) (D) ) . Refer also to a letter written by the <br /> BLM on March 8, 1994, stating that MCC's plan is adequate to meet <br /> all current Federal regulations regarding R2P2 and MER. Refer also <br /> to the Coal Unsuitability Analysis for Jumbo Mountain Coal Lease, <br /> prepared by the Uncompahgre Basin Resource Area of the BLM, which <br /> includes an Environmental Assessment; <br /> g) One hundred feet of the outside right-of-way line of any public road <br /> except where mine access or haul roads join such line, and excepting <br /> any roads for which the necessary approvals have been received, <br /> notices published, public hearing opportunities provided, and <br /> written findings made (2.07.6(2) (d) (iv) ) . More specifically, the <br /> West Elk mine permit area is within 100 feet of the outside <br /> right-of-way line of State Highway 133. <br /> At an informal conference held May 12, 1981, in Paonia, Colorado, to <br /> review public input on the proposed West Elk Mine, no mention of any <br /> concern with the location of the surface facilities in relation to <br /> the existing or proposed right-of-way of State Highway 133 was <br /> expressed or implied. <br /> The Colorado Department of Highways approves the location of the <br /> West Elk Mine within 100 feet of the outside right-of-way. <br /> On August 6, 1981, the Division granted a variance from the road <br /> distance requirement of Rule 2.07.6 (2) (d) (iv) . <br /> The Division's notice of proposed decision approving the variance <br /> was published June 29, 1981, and no comments were received during <br /> the ten-day public comment period, which expired on July 8, 1981. <br /> h) Three hundred feet of an occupied dwelling unless a written waiver <br /> from the owner has been provided (2.07.6 (2) (d) (v) ) . <br /> 5. On the basis of information submitted by Mountain Coal Company in the <br /> form of Exhibit 11, the Division finds that subject to valid existing <br /> rights as of August 3, 1977, the mining operation will not adversely <br /> affect any publicly owned park or place listed on or eligible for <br /> listing in the National Register of Historic Places as determined by the <br /> State Historic Preservation Office (2.07.6 (2) (e) (i) ) . <br /> 6. For this surface mining operation, private mineral estate has not been <br /> severed from private surface estate; therefore, the documentation <br /> specified by Rule 2.03.6 (2) is not required (2.07.6 (2) (f) ) . <br /> 7 . On the basis of evidence submitted by the applicant and received from <br /> other state and federal agencies as a result of the Section 34-33-114 (3) <br /> compliance review required by the Colorado Surface Coal Mining <br /> Reclamation Act, the :Division finds that Mountain Coal Company does not <br /> own or control any operations which are currently in violation of any <br /> law, rule, or regulation of the United States, or any State law, rule, <br /> or regulation, or any provision of the Surface Mining Control and <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.