My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42880
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42880
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:40 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:03:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
Federal Leases C-1362 C-0117192 & D-044569 Decision Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• known to occur rarely in areas with more than 300 feet of <br />overburden. The B-seam mining would occur in locations with <br />400 to 1000 feet of overburden. Two special conditions of <br />approval are recommended to protect unsurveyed cultural <br />resources in the event that new subsidence or cultural <br />resources information indicates that cultural resources may <br />be affected by subsidence. The SHPO concurred with OSM's <br />determination in a letter dated December 15, 1989, <br />b. Water supply and quality values <br />The probable hydrologic consequences of mining at the <br />Mt. Gunnison No. 1 mine should not change in substance from <br />the predictions made in OSM's November 1987 Environmental <br />Assessment. Subsidence control plans should be sufficient <br />to control adverse effects on Sylvester Gulch. While <br />drainage patterns may be affected slightly in the permit <br />area, subsidence is not expected to adversely affect surface <br />flow in the ephemeral streams of the permit area. All <br />drainage would continue to flow to the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison River. There would be no changes to the drainage <br />patterns of the Minnesota Creek watershed, nor any <br />depletions of surface water flows in the Minnesota Creek <br />watershed. <br />• The worst-case depletion of springs and seeps discussed <br />in OSM's November 1987 Environmental Assessment would not <br />change due to the B-seam mining. The one additional spring <br />that could be affected by B-seam mining produces less than 2 <br />gpm. If affected by subsidence, the loss of surface flow to <br />the North Fork of the Gunnison River would be negligible. <br />WECC has committed to develop undeveloped springs to <br />mitigate any loss of water from existing developed springs. <br />Subsidence is expected to be minimal in the areas where <br />the stockponds are located. The overburden is more than 800 <br />feet thick. If subsidence does affect the viability of a <br />stockpond, WECC has committed to replace or repair any ponds <br />to mitigate any loss of water due to mining activities. <br />Fracturing of strata above the B seam is expected to <br />have minimal, if any effect on aquifers below the B seam. <br />The only significant regional aquifer in the area (i.e., the <br />Rollins Sandstone) is about 60 feet below the B seam and is <br />virtually unused because of its depth. The strata between <br />the B seam and the Rollins Sandstone consist of interbedded <br />shales and sandstones that will effectively preclude <br />infiltration of water below the B-seam mining area. <br />B-seam inflows are projected to be about 15 gpm <br />initially and 10 gpm on a long-term basis when production <br />reaches 1.4 million tons per year. Inflows could triple to <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.