Laserfiche WebLink
Coal Methane Drainage Project - Panek 16-24 Wett E!k Mme • Aage 3-3 <br />movement features identified as NSO areas. The CSU stipulations specify engineered designs and <br />appropriate surface mitigation measures to minimize the potential for slope failure and control <br />erosion in these aeeas. Designated NSO and CSU areas are identified and delineated on Map Ml, <br />Project Area Activities With Surface Stipulations. <br />3.1.1.3 Surface Water <br />The main surface drainage in the area is the North Fork of the Gunnison River (North Fork). The <br />North Fork is classified as Class 1 Aquatic Life Cold, Class 1 Recreation, Water Supply and <br />Agriculture. Stream flows in the North Fork generally peak between late April and late June and <br />flows may increase 300 percent from low flow winter discharges. Flows are controlled by releases <br />from Paonia Reservoir upstream from the project area and the Town of Somerset. North Fork water <br />is used primarily for downstream irrigation in late summer and fall. <br />The project azea encompasses portions of four watersheds, all of which are tributary io the North <br />Fork: <br />• Sylvester Gulch and its tributaries, which is duectiy tributary to the North Foxk (all Panels <br />except 18, 19 and 20) <br />• Box Canyon, which is directly tributary to the North Fork (Panels ] 8, 19, 20 and portions of <br />21 and 22) <br />• Raven Gulch, including Deep Creek and minor tributaries (portions of Panels 16, 17, 175, <br />and 19 through 24) <br />• Tributaries to the Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek (Panel 175) <br />With the exception of Deep Creek, which is a perennial stream in the southeast portion of the project <br />area, drainages within the project azea are ephemeral or intermittent, flowing only in response to <br />snowmelt runoff or intense thunderstorm events. The Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek receives much <br />of its flow from the Deep Creek Ditch, an inter-basin diversion that provides flow in Dry Fork for <br />several additional months each yeaz. Incremental flow contributions to the North Fork from these <br />watersheds aze a minor percentage of total annual and season flows. <br />The USGS, in cooperation with State agencies, collects surface water data from four monitoring <br />stations located on or near the North Fork, both upstream and downstream from the West Elk Mine. <br />General water quality data was obtained from two of the stations and additional pazameters were <br />available from the station located near the confluence of Sylvester Gulch and the North Fork. Data <br />from the USGS stations were used to establish pre-mining baseline conditions for MCC's CDMG <br />Permit as a basis for evaluating any changes in North Fork water quality resulting from dischazges at <br />the West Elk Mine. <br />Surface water quality in the project area is generally consistent with the North Fork. Total dissolved <br />solids, total settleable solids, and iron concentrations can inaease dramatically during snowmelt or <br />following intense storm events, pazticulazly in the smaller drainages. Water quality of streams can <br />vary dramatically depending on time of year, Flows volume, and location. <br />Some surface water in the azea comes from seeps and springs. Seeps and springs ori~ittate from <br />either shallow perched ground tables or from bedrock outcrops. Discharge data for the mine permit <br />has been collected from approximately 83 springs. Approximately two-thirds of the springs emanate <br />from colluvium and shallow ground water sources. Key chazacteristics of shallow groundwater are <br />described in Section 3.1.1.4. Neazly all of the bedrock springs in this area are vt the Barren Member <br />of the Mesa Verde Formation. These springs exhibit seasonal flucmarions in flow, though not as <br />EnvironmextalArtetrment <br />b+r~/M..n+. CwG/En~r~.rp!nla>e~ vfFt <br />i/trozm <br />