GENERAL42859 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

III IIIIIIIIIIIII III The Corley Company Phone 632-6050 P.O. Box 1821 COLORADO SPRINGS COLORADO 80901 RFCF~v~o Jan. 25, 1994 JAN 26 1994 Mr, Larry P, Routten Division of Minerals & Geology =1..~~,~ • , ~;,,~~E ~~,~ 6lacl'IC(!v 1313 Sherman St. Denver CO 80203 Dear Mr. Routten: Our understanding of the Dec. 21, 1993, meeting was that you were going to prepare the amended agreement and the proposed letter to the board for our review. Obviously, there was no meeting of the minds regarding the letter. Specifically about the letter, you only state that "the previous modelling was in error". There is no indication of the magnitude of error which is approximately 600%. You state that the undersized culvert resulted in "some. problems". We think that any reader of the letter would minimize the impact of the "problems". You do mention that the DMG-Harrison-Western-Corley agreement states that the Division determined that the actual cost will not exceed $18,500, but you do not mention that there was no construction plan on which to base that cost estimate. Further, the low bid for the work was not $29,000, but $33,000. Since you want us to communicate any corrections to the Board, we do not believe that you have completed your part of the agreement. We no longer wish to go ahead with our suggested compromise. [de understand now that any future agreement must be in writing. Do you have any suggestions? With regard to the DMG letter to the Vento Trust, there is a property description for the Duck Pond of the "EZti Sec 24". That same description was used for the Vento Trust property. The E41~ of a section does not exist. The Duck Pond is in the SEI~NEZ and the NEtiSE14 Sec. 24. The Vento Trust does not own any land in Sec. 24; they own the SW1 Sec. 19. Mr. Robinson was confused about the location. S'i`nlcer(~e]ly, ~ W ~~- W.D. Corley, President