My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42857
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42857
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:39 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:01:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/26/1994
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
dissolved solids may increase due to soluble salts; however, this occurs <br />naturally within the existing ground water region. The fill does not contain <br />materials which create a toxic leachate. Water which infiltrates the fill may <br />reach Scullion Gulch. However, due to the small area of disturbance relative <br />to the entire drainage basin for Scullion Gulch, this will be a very minor <br />contribution of flow in the creek. <br />The permittee will be obtaining part of the required water supply from the <br />White River Lagoon, as discussed eazlier. Approximately 600 gpm will be <br />pumped from the lagoon to a head tank in the D-Portal area. This is less than <br />one percent of the low flow of the White River. Therefore, impacts will not <br />be significant. <br />Recharge of the ground water is not excepted to be impacted significantly by <br />the proposed mining operation. Most of the recharge area for the Mesaverde <br />aquifers is outside of the mine plan area. It is possible that surface fracturing <br />resulting from subsidence could increase recharge to the Upper Williams <br />Fork. However, these cracks, if they occur, are expected to exist for only a <br />short period of time before they seal up. <br />Recharge of the White River alluvium by bedrock aquifers is not considered <br />to be significant because of the low transmissivities of the aquifers. The <br />permittee has estimated that total discharge could be 1.3 gpm through bedrock <br />aquifers to the White River, which is less than a tenth of a percent of the base <br />flow of the river. Therefore, changes in the recharge capacity of the bedrock <br />aquifers is not expected to be a significant impact to the alluvial aquifer. <br />The surface recharge capacity of the alluvial material in Scullion Gulch may <br />be reduced due to the construction of cuts and fills th the portal areas. This <br />disturired area is small relative to [he total area of Scullion Gulch and <br />therefore impacts are expected to be very minor. <br />Due to the presence of Kenney Reservoir, water withdrawal from the White <br />River lagoon will not cause measurable drawdown in the alluvium at the well <br />field site. The quantity of water which will be pumped is less than one <br />percent of the low flow of the river. <br />Subsidence from underground mine workings could potentially impact both <br />Red Wash and Scullion Gulch. The effect on Red Wash is of greatest <br />importance because it drains approximately 122 square miles at the location <br />where mining will extend beneath it. Although predictions indicate that <br />maximum vertical subsidence could approach six feet, large crevasses or <br />collapse of the surface should not occur because there is approximately 600 to <br />1200 feet of overburden above the coal seam in that area. Furthermore, the <br />swelling of shales and overburden from the caved roof should effectively fill <br />the open mine cavity. An ongoing monitoring program was implemented to <br />detect subsidence on the first longwall panel and first room-and-pillaz section <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.