My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42810
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:37 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:59:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/13/1983
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />?4id-Term Review <br />.4t. Gunnison No. 1 ;4ine <br />Introduction <br />This document presents the results of the Division's mid-term review of West <br />Elk Coal Company's Mt. Gunnison No. 1 Hine. This inid-term review was <br />conducted to fulfill the requirements of Rule 2.08.3, 2.06.2(9), 2.Ob.3(4), <br />2.06.5(3), 2.06.7(5) and 3.02.2(4). <br />Rule 2.08.3 requires that the Division conduct a review of eacn permit issued, <br />prior to its mid-term (2 1/2 years). Based on this review, for good Cause <br />shown, the Division nay require reasonable revision or modification of the <br />permit provisions to ensure compliance with the Act and Regulations. <br />Rules 2.Uci.2, 3, 5 and 7 requires that experimental practices, mountaintop <br />removal variances, variances from AOC, and variances from contemporaneous <br />reclamation be reviewed by the Division where applicable. The Mt. Gunnison <br />permit does not have any operations under these categories. <br />Rule 3.02.2(4) requires that the Division review the amount of the bond and <br />the terns of acceptance of the bond every 2 1/2 years. <br />The mid-tern review consisted of a detailed review of the Mt. Gunnison No. 1 <br />Permit application to identify any items that may have been overlooked during <br />the initial review. Tne Division also reviewed all subsequent revisions and <br />stipulation responses to ensure that all permit commitments and conditions <br />were being followed. Hydrologic monitoring data was reviewed in conjunction <br />with the review of the application to assess the adequacy of the monitoring <br />plan and discussion of hydrologic impacts. Finally, the Division conducted a <br />comprehensive on site inspection of the mine to ensure consistency of the mine <br />plan with field conditions. Problems and observations from past inspection <br />reports were considered while conducting the inspection. <br />This document is organized as follows: Section I includes a summary of our <br />decision to require revisions with regard to the mid-term review required <br />under Rule 2.08.3. Section IA includes a listing by category of what items <br />need to be revised, a rationale for requiring these revisions, and timetables <br />for completing these revisions. Section IB includes an advisory section on <br />items identified furing the review that may need to be considered in future <br />permit terms. Section IC presents a summary of the status of the stipulations <br />attached to the Mt. Gunnison Permit C-007-80 and any revisions required with <br />regard to the stipulations. Finally, Section II presents the results of the <br />bond review required under Rule 3.02.2(4). The responses to items identified <br />in Section IA should be submitted as one package in a format that allows easy <br />insertion into the application by June 1, 1984. The response to our bonding <br />concerns in Section II should be submitted by April 1, 1984. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.