My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42732
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42732
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:32 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:56:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976032
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/5/1996
From
USFS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fi, <br />Environmental Assessment <br />S~an~guel River <br />Restoration <br />)~,Qject <br />I. Introduction: Purpose and Need <br />The purpose of this Environmental Assessment (EAj is to describe the <br />environmental effects of a proposal to rehabilitate and restore the mainstem <br />San Miguel and South Fork San Miguel Rivers to stable condition typical of this <br />stream channel type. The mainstem and South Fork have been subjected to not <br />only major flood events and very high natural sediment loads, but more recently <br />to in-channel gravel mining and channel avulsion, i.e., a shift in the course <br />of the stream. <br />Gravel mining operations in the active channel and floodplain started on <br />private lands downstream of the South Fork in the 1970's. By the mid-1980's, <br />these operations had expanded to National Foresi Lends. Ae a result of this <br />mining activity, the stream morphology has changed from a meandering stream <br />type on the South Fork San Miguel to an entrenched, braided channel which <br />continues to widen and become more entrenched with each high flow. The changes <br />which have occurred resulted in not only a shift in stream type and stability, <br />but a loss of floodplain and riparian vegetation. <br />There is a need to undertake these actions in late summer in order to complete <br />the construction and instream work prior to winter freeze-up. Several <br />alternative ways of carrying out these action are described in this document. <br />Each of the alternatives, excluding the No Action Alternative, is designed to <br />restore the natural stability and functioning of both the river and riparian <br />sytems. <br />This Environmental Assessment is not a decision document: it does not describe <br />the decision to be made by the Forest Supervisor with regard to this proposed <br />project. This Environmental Assessment discloses the environmental <br />consequences of implementing the proposed action and alternatives to that <br />action, The Forest Supervisor's decision will be stated and explained in a <br />Decision Notice which will be developed after this EA undergoes a 30 day public <br />comment period, and the comments from that review have been analyzed and <br />addressed. <br />This Environmental Assessment focuses on the environmental effects associated <br />with the proposed action on the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National <br />Forests. Impacts which may occur on lands adjacent to the National Forest, and <br />impacts which may occur in surrounding coamiunities also are described in this <br />document so that other landowners and decfsionmakers may be aware of the <br />implications of this Forest Service project. Other Federal, state end local <br />jurisdictions have assisted in the analysis and disclosure of these <br />environmental consequences and in the development of alternatives [o the <br />proposed action. (See "Agencies and Organizations Consulted^ on page 10.) <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.