My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42668
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42668
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:26 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:54:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/4/1984
Doc Name
BASELINE VEGETATION INVENTORY TRINDAD BASIN MINE LAS ANIMAS CNTY COLO
Permit Index Doc Type
VEGETATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br />3.3 PLANT SPECIES LIST <br />A total of 182 species of vascular plants were recorded in the permit <br />area (Table 101. This number was relatively high for an area of only <br />' 1,180 acres. This is probably a result of the varying slopes and <br />exposures of the site and because two general geographic regions, the <br />southern Rocky Mountains and the desert southwest, influence the site <br />flora. the number of species per lifeform was as follows: trees--9, <br />' shrubs and subshrubs--20, succulents--5, perennial graminoids--41, <br />annual graminoids--7, perennial forbs--77, and annual (orbs--28. <br />Approximately 15 percent, or 28 species, were introduced from out- <br />side the geographic region. These consisted primarily of annual forbs; <br />however, some areas had previously been seeded with introduced perennial <br />' graminoi~7s. One species, Cvavv.lvu.(u~ vaven~i~, considered a prohibitive <br />noxious weed (Thornton et al. 19741, occurs in the permit area. In <br />addition, two restricted noxious weed species, 9vv axi.l.lv~ia and <br />Ag~vpynwi aepena, were also found in the permit area. None of these <br />species were common on the site. <br />' 3.4 THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES <br /> Based on field observations in August 1984, no plant species which <br /> are designated, proposed, or under review for possible proposal as <br />' threatened or endangered by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 11980) <br /> are present in the permit area. Likewise, no species of "special concern" <br /> as listed by the Colorado Natural Heritage Inventory were located. <br /> <br /> 3.5 SPECIES DIVERSITY <br />' In terms of total species richness, the Pinyon-Juniper Woodland <br /> Complex contained 43 species that contributed to relative cover, while <br /> the Meadow contained only 30. In the Pinyon-Juniper Woodland Complex, <br />' seven plant species contributed 3 percent or greater relative cover. <br /> These were three trees (pinyon pine, one-seed juniper, and ponderosa <br /> pinel, 2 shrubs (Gambel's oak and mountain mahoganyl, and 2 perennial <br /> grasses lsideozis grams and blue gramal. It is suggested that the <br />' reclamation standard be one tree, two shrubs, and three grasses. By <br /> deleting one tree from and adding one grass to the standard, a more <br /> diverse rnix of forage will be available To livestock and wildlife. <br /> In hhe Meadow vegetation type, five perennial graminoids contri- <br /> buted 3 percent or more to relative cover. These were western wheat- <br />' grass, Agassiz bluegrass, sand dropseed, sleepy grass, and green <br /> needlegr+3ss, the first two being sod formers and the rest bunch grasses. <br /> It is suggested that the reclamation standard be four grasses, including <br /> two sod and two bunch grasses. <br />1 <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.