My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42581
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42581
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:20 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:52:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/2/1987
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR PR1
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Shallow overburden Unit 4 material (Tab 13, p. 13-3a) displays geochemical and <br />lithologic characteristics which indicate that this material will be <br />unsuitable as a plant growth medium. Therefore, this material will not be <br />placed within four feet of the backfilled area surface. Mixing of this <br />material with other overburden zones upon backfilling of each mining pit will <br />mitigate any potential ground water recharge contamination. <br />Deep overburden Class 4 material (Tab 13, p. 13-3) displays geochemical and <br />lithologic characteristics which make this material unsuitable as a plant <br />growth medium. This material will not be placed within four feet of the <br />backfilled area surface. This material also displays acidity limitations <br />which may degrade ground water recharge. Therefore, the Class 4 material will <br />be placed not less than ten (10) feet from the bottom of any mining pit. <br />To ensure the adequacy of the special handling plan, Peabody will conduct a <br />spoil quality sampling program in the backfilled areas of the mine. The upper <br />three feet of spoil will be sampled on a 300 foot grid for pH, acid base <br />potential, salinity, and particle size. If unsuitable material is identified, <br />appropriate mitigative measures will be implemented, as described in Volume 2, <br />Tab 6 of the permit application. <br />The operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br />V. Surface Water Hydrology - Rules 2.04.5, 2.04.7, 2.05.3(4), 2.05.6(3) and <br />4.05 <br />Information on surface water hydrology can be found in Tab 7, Volumes 3 <br />through 6 of the permit application. Section I (Volume 3, p. 7-1 to 7-41A) <br />provides a description of regional hydrology and baseline monitoring data. <br />Section Y (Volume 3, p. 7-69 to 7-191) provides an updated discussion and <br />evaluation of data collected through 1986. <br />Surface water at the Nucla Mine drains into Tuttle Draw, a tributary of the <br />San Miguel River in west-central Colorado. Irrigation return flow is an <br />important component of runoff from the mine site in terms of water quality <br />considerations. The Lower Second Park Irrigation Ditch traverses the site <br />above most of the mining disturbance. Seepage losses from the ditch arise as <br />Springs and seeps at lower elevations and contribute to baseflow in surface <br />streams. The drainage from the northern portion of the permit area is <br />referred to as the West Return Ditch. This drainage meets Tuttle Draw to the <br />south before it leaves the permit area. Tuttle Draw flows in a southwesterly <br />direction about 2.5 miles before it enters the San Miguel River. <br />Runoff from the disturbed area within the Nucla Mine is controlled by a number <br />of sedimentation ponds at the mine. As a part of the Permit Revision No. 1 <br />application review, all of the ponds on site were reevaluated as to sizing <br />requirements, discharge structures and detention time provided in the design. <br />Previously, Peabody was granted a variance from the design requirements of <br />Rule 4.05.6 for Ponds 002-007 because they were located below areas of pre-law <br />disturbance or previous reclamation activities. With the change in mining at <br />the site, these ponds (except Pond 003) were upgraded and now meet the design <br />requirements of Rule 4.05.6. Pond 003 has not been upgraded and will still <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.