My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42548
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42548
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:18 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:51:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/8/1999
From
SHEPHERD MILLER
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ ' the length of ] 670 feet, a width of 3 feet, and a depth of 50 feet, approximately 9280 cyds of <br />slurry wall will be installed. Approximately 50% of the wall material will be backfill <br />~ ' material consisting of the soil/slurry mixture. Therefore, approximately 4640 cyds of either <br />screened on-site or off-site borrow material will be required for construction of the slurry <br />' wall. <br />' During slurry wall installation, water supply will be required. This water w 11 be obtained <br />from a combination of either M-17, BF-1, BF-3, BF-4, or BF-5 at a maximurl nominal rate <br />of approximately 400 gpm. <br />' 3.1 Hydrology <br />Minimizing the rate of inflow from the Rito Seco alluvium would be beneficial in that the <br />' total rate of inflow to the West Pit (approximately 80 gpm, Section 3.1.4.4 of fR-26) would <br />decrease. Therefore, after placement of the slurry wall the sources of water flow into the <br />West Pi[ would be restricted to Precambrian bedrock flow and limited .nfiltration of <br />precipitation through the backfill (Figure 3). The decrease in the rate of groundwater inflow <br />' would translate directly into along-term reduction in the volume of water that ~NOUId need to <br />be managed to maintain the tazget water level in the West Pit as described in TR-2b. <br />' Placement of the slurry wall would not constitute a final solution to hydrologic: flows in the <br />' vicinity of the West Pit because the modification to the naturally open hydrologic system <br />imposed by the slurry wall would not control all of the governing hydrologic: flows. The <br />' hillside to the north of the West Pit represents the recharge zone that contributes to the inflow <br />of Precambrian bedrock groundwater to the West Pit. Water levels measured in Precambrian <br />' well PC-1 indicate that there is sufficient potential hydraulic head in the Precambrian <br />bedrock aquifer to cause the water level in the West Pit [o increase sufficien[l,~ to intercept <br />' the land surface if a slurry wall was installed and no other hydrologic controls were <br />instituted. Thus, an artificial outflow of water from the West Pit must be provided to <br />' maintain steady-state hydrologic conditions in the overall system (recharge zone to outflow). <br />' Therefore, some form of water level control would also have to be implemented in order to <br />control the water level elevation in the West Pit. From the standpoint of water level control, <br />' Bae/e Moanmrn Resources, lnc. Srtepherd Miller, lnc. <br />P:IleeT6%L1'7u.ryN'dlUhrignnpvrr 3Z S Nmem6er 5, /999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.