My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42484
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42484
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:13 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:48:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981011
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
Public Notice for Formal Public Hearing for Highwall Variance
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7. "Any highwall remanent shall be <br />stable and not pose a hazard to the public <br />health and safety or to the environment. <br />The operator shall demonstrate, to the <br />satisfaction of the regulatory authority, <br />that the highwall remnant is stable". <br />8. "Spoil placed on the outslope <br />during previous mining operations shall <br />not be disturbed if such disturbance will <br />cause instability of the remaining spoil or <br />otherwise increase the hazard to the <br />public health and safety or to the <br />environment". <br />Tke highwall that will remain is just below <br />an outcrop of sandstone that naturally spalls <br />large rocks as a result of freeze thaw action. <br />The highwall exposure consists of shale and <br />lens of sandstone. The spalling from tl:e <br />highwall would be smaller pieces of rock <br />than the overlying sandstone outcrop. The <br />remaining highwall would be expected to be <br />more stable than the undisturbed urea. <br />This does not apply; spoil material was not <br />placed on the outslopes of the bent!:. <br />The Division requests that the Board approve a variance from the requirement to <br />completely eliminate the highwall at the Apex No. 2 mine. The Division has initiated Rule <br />making to modify this requirement and to allow an exception for mines that have operated <br />before the effective date of the Act. This change will bring the Division's regulations in line <br />with those of the Federal Government. Apex's reclamation plan complies with Federal <br />regulations that the State of Colorado will soon adopt. Attached is a draft settlement <br />agreement which will allow Sunland to reclaim the mine while leaving a partial highwall <br />exposed. <br />RPP/rpp/apbordlt.wp <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.